It is our primary storage.
The easiest route - we'll conduct a 15 minute phone interview and write up the review for you.
Use our online form to submit your review. It's quick and you can post anonymously.
It is our primary storage.
It is easy for our organization to manage data using Panzura.
We take snapshots of everything every hour. It does incremental backups. We have several different types of backups, so we never have a problem with restoring if anything ever happens.
Panzura Detect & Rescue does a good job of detecting threats in real-time.
Panzura Edge helps give people access to the Panzura system on iPads or nontraditional devices, and it works great for that. It is very important for us to have secure data access for mobile devices.
Panzura has not helped to reduce data storage costs. We have all of our storage on Azure, but one thing they allowed us to do was to have a good way of archiving data. We do not have everything in hot storage anymore. We have some in cold storage. They had a way for us to move our data to a lower-cost tier.
We were able to realize its benefits pretty much immediately. We bought it originally for four offices and did a proof of concept for the first month. Within two weeks, we bought 23 additional units to put in all our offices.
It is a very solid product. We keep all of our older files on their system. It is easy to restore if a file gets deleted. We have good disaster recovery. It is very reliable and very quick, and we do not have files that get overwritten because it locks the file.
For me, it is the stability aspect. It is a lot more stable now than it ever has been, but just keeping that stability is important. Previously, a new update would come out, and there might be something wrong with it, or it may not sync up as well as it should, or it may cause something to lose access to the server. We have had some problems in the past, but in the last couple of years, we have not had any issues like we had early on.
There could be a slightly better dashboard or a better pane of glass. When something goes wrong somewhere, there should be a little bit better alerting with issues before they become a big problem.
We have been their customer for 12 years.
We have had some problems in the past, but in the last couple of years, we have not had issues. I would rate it a nine out of ten for stability.
I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten.
The support has been good. We have had stretches in the past that were not as good, but over 12 years with someone, you are going to have some ups and downs. The support staff and the number of people they have on staff right now are truly good.
Positive
We were using a software program from Peer Software. It was a long time ago. It might work better now than when we used it, but it was not replicating data between our offices in real-time. We would have to wait a long time before it would replicate our files between offices.
I am pretty sure it is easy. When we put new units in, it goes quickly. They have a cloud offering now that you can get up and running in less than an afternoon.
It does not take a lot. One person can get it set up pretty easily.
When it comes to maintenance, we have a person who will apply updates to the system. One primary person at my work takes care of it.
It has helped increase our organization’s network resilience, but it is hard to quantify. Panzura is a hundred percent better than what we had before. Previously, we had latency issues with syncing up files between offices. Files were not locked, leading to overwrites which cost us literally hundreds of thousands of dollars in lost time and revenue. Since transitioning to Panzura, it has been like a night-and-day difference.
It is not bad. It is like everything else. Pricing has gone up quite over the last couple of years, but everybody's pricing has gone up. For what they deliver, it is right in line with what everybody else has.
You could start with just a handful of offices and do a proof of concept to see how it goes for you before deploying it enterprise-wide. I would start with either a small group or maybe small offices, two or three offices, and see how it works.
Overall, I would rate the product a nine out of ten.
We are moving on-premise project data migrated to Azure file shares. We currently have all offices, and we have just moved our on-premise user data to Azure. We used Azure Files to sync our on-prem data to Azure file shares.
We use it for the on-prem caching servers. We have a small footprint of on-prem File Sync servers at each of the office locations. We use Azure File Sync for that.
We have used Komprise integration to help us migrate old data from Azure file shares to cold storage for tiering purposes. Komprise is a third party tool that we utilized.
I have not used application hosting features myself. I have read that you can lift-shift an application to Azure Files, and you may be able to do something like database hosting on it, but I have not yet used that feature.
The valuable features are basically efficiency and availability, which are the prime processes, and the cost billing which is available on Azure. This gives you the correct picture of estimation and cost estimations. If we need to migrate data, Azure Files allows a seamless data migration. If the same thing were done on-prem, it would be a longer process.
From a resilience point of view, we have storage accounts with LRS and ZRS. We are currently using LRS copies of it. We have backup of Azure Files storage in the recovery service vault, which provides backup with us.
I think if Azure Files could integrate migration using Storage Mover, that would be an improvement. I don't think they have an option currently. Storage Mover only has an option to migrate blob storage or cold storage from one subscription to another subscription or from one tenant to another tenant. You only have options to migrate blob storage. For Azure Files, that is an SMB transfer, so you need to use AZCopy for that.
If there is a migration where you want to migrate your blob storage from one subscription to another or from one tenant to another, you have the Storage Mover option where you can easily migrate blob storage. However, Storage Mover does not support Azure Files.
The scalability has a maximum of 100 TB. That is what is available, but we don't have a use case where we go beyond 100 TB. I don't see an option for scalability beyond that or for maximum storage. I would rate this as seven.
We have Azure Files and Azure ML as well. I work on the infrastructure part of Azure like Azure Files. Integration is very simple. My overall review rating for Azure Files is nine.