Qlik Replicate Reviews

Our primary use case is to transform and modernize our analytics environment and modernize the data pipelines.

It enables us to transform data at the latest stage rather than in ETL loads, so it's more ELT which is one of the advantages. It is also in near real-time, which brings significant advantage for our embedded analytics approach.

We have technical people who work with it. I do not have a lot of feedback to provide at this stage. We want to implement a data lake but that's at the second stage to be integrated with the other tools that we use, which are Qlik. Since we use Qlik, we intend to leverage Attunity's capabilities because Attunity is now part of the portfolio.

I have been using Qlik Replicate for around two months. 

We've had a team of consultants helping us directly. So we do not use support now. We are in the phase where we're really working with the consultants from Qlik now.

It was easy to set up. We had specialists who helped us with the setup. We have around three users. 

It's being used daily. 

It's extremely promising. It implements new real-time capabilities for data ingestion. It works in hybrid mode that is a hybrid cloud. This is very good and it looks like it has very good performance. We're quite happy.

I would rate it a nine out of ten.

In the next release, I would like to see closer integration with data catalyst.

I am a consultant who is using Qlik Replicate for one of our customers. It is primarily used for the historical load, as well as the incremental load.

Our current project involves a client that has their legacy data in SAP HANA. They want to transfer all of the data from SAP into Snowflake. It involves terabytes of data and Qlik is being extensively used.

From a technical perspective, this is an excellent product.

Qlik can be made more user-friendly.

Support-wise, this solution is in need of improvement.

We have been working with Qlik Replicate for almost one year.

This product is very stable.

The scalability is very good. My customer has about ten people who are using this solution.

When we reach out to technical support, they should be good enough to support us.

When we reached out to them to assist with doing the PoC for our customer, they declined my request. Our customers were trying to access their data and when we asked certain questions from the Qlik folks, they were heavily focused on the licensing issue and wasted time with that while we could have been solving the problem.

By comparison, when I speak with HVR technical support, they never ask anything like this. Rather, they will directly help us. They receive the problem and straightaway they will try to help us. This enables us to better speak with our customers.

We are a partner, and when we want to reach out to the Qlik experts, we would like to receive answers.

Overall, I would rate their support a four out of five.

I have used HVR and I feel that it has more features than Qlik. It is also more customer-friendly.

Feature-wise, I cannot think of any improvement that is needed. We are very happy with Qlik, no doubt about it. The only problem is with support. When we ask for technical assistance they should be in a position to support us.

I would rate this solution a ten out of ten.