The virtualized app servers for enterprise systems supporting all HR functions is valuable.
President at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
The virtualized app servers for enterprise systems supporting all HR functions is valuable. We haven't had a patching exercise occur without significant problems.
What is most valuable?
How has it helped my organization?
We get better performance and utilization of resources since it was implemented. It's helped to reduce the batch cycle from over 40 hours to about eight.
What needs improvement?
It's very expensive. Oracle Platinum Services (patching) is terrible, and we haven't had a patching exercise occur without significant problems and often impact to production operations.
For how long have I used the solution?
We began the implementation the fall of 2012 and completed in September of 2013. It has been in place since then with expansion and upgrades along the way.
Buyer's Guide
Oracle Exalogic [EOL]
May 2025

Learn what your peers think about Oracle Exalogic [EOL]. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2025.
857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
Significant issues with deployment of OTD (Oracle Traffic Director).
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Stability for the most part has been good with some production impact which resulted from patching and version control. The product needs a better support model.
How are customer service and support?
Level 1 and Level 2 I would give 6/10. Level 3 I would give 9/10. The problem was the time it took to reach the appropriate level of support to solve the problem.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Prior to the Exa platform we ran on M5000.
How was the initial setup?
This was a complex implementation. Implementation of Grid, RAC, and especially OTD was a nightmare. However, once solved, it has performed well and remained stable. This was not an issue with the solution itself but more related to the technical understanding of the network design coupled with the technical knowledge required for setup of OTD. We ultimately received level three support from the Oracle product team that solved the problem. The level 3 product team was excellent.
What about the implementation team?
I led the vendor team team that managed the implementation. We also engaged ACS and OCS (Oracle Consulting Service) to assist with the implementation.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Selection of Exa was after a Proof of Concept comparison with VCE, IBM, and HP. Exa had superior performance results with a significant higher cost.
What other advice do I have?
I would suggest that you do not underestimate the work involved and if working with OCS closely manage the deliverables and hours.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.

Sr. Enterprise Architect at a tech consulting company with 501-1,000 employees
If you're looking for the best performance for Oracle environments, at the expense of some ease of administration, then this is for you.
Valuable Features
- Oracle application/middleware performance optimization
- Virtualization with bare metal performance
Improvements to My Organization
Exalogic has provided us and our customers with high performance Oracle Weblogic, eBusiness Suite applications and concurrent manager platform. Even with running in a virtualized configuration, the performance seen has been better than running on non-Exalogic physical environments. The ability to connect Exalogic to Exadata via Infiniband has also optimized performance between application and database improving application performance. This is particularly true for chatty weblogic applications or eBS large concurrent manager jobs like those related to advanced supply chain planning.
Room for Improvement
The administration of the VMs is cumbersome and lacks features that are taken for granted in other virtualization platforms – many administrative and availability features, even available in traditional OVM, are not available on Exalogic. This includes not having the ability to increase VM resources while the VM is online, or even being able to change CPU and memory sizes for a VM without recreating and cloning it. There is also no live migration feature available.
Use of Solution
I've been using it for two and a half years.
Deployment Issues
There have been no issues with the deployment.
Stability Issues
We've had no issues with the performance.
Scalability Issues
It's been able to scale for our needs.
Customer Service and Technical Support
The support on the Exalogic is much better than other, non-engineered Oracle environments. Exalogic comes included with Oracle Platinum Services – a higher level of Oracle technical support – providing Oracle access to the system and allowing for faster responsiveness and resolution to issues.
Initial Setup
The initial setup has to be performed by Oracle or a certified partner. Stating that, the initial install and setup is straightforward and is completed in a few days.
Implementation Team
As an Oracle certified partner, we implemented in-house. My advice is to utilize Oracle certified Partners, to do the implementation or utilize Oracle ACS. We have also had experiences with network conflicts in past Exalogic implementations. And much of the network configuration can not be changed without a re-install. My advice is to ensure the network addresses and information given in the Exalogic Configurator worksheet, filled out before install, is accurate and does not conflict with other addresses in the corporate network.
Other Solutions Considered
We compared commodity server based environments – but they were unable to match the performance of Exalogic.
Other Advice
Exalogic is an environment built for performance for Oracle middleware and application workloads. If you are looking for the best performance for such environments, at the expense of some ease of administration, then this environment is for you.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partners
Buyer's Guide
Oracle Exalogic [EOL]
May 2025

Learn what your peers think about Oracle Exalogic [EOL]. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2025.
857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Senior Oracle DWH/BI/ODI/Linux/Exadata Consultant Exa Techstack at a insurance company with 5,001-10,000 employees
We were able to decommission blade servers, all of which are now running on Exalogic.
What is most valuable?
OVM and the InfiniBand readiness ([IBO] TCP port settings) of the VM’s in this OVM version for Exalogic are the most valuable features.
How has it helped my organization?
We were able to decommission more then 20 blade servers, all of which are now running on Exalogic.
What needs improvement?
There is still room for improvement, especially in regards to Oracle support.
Also, the SDP InfiniBand protocol needs to be usable in VM’s and patches for OVM installed for delivery.
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
We had no issues deploying it.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
OTD (Oracle Traffic Director) is failover architecture and is not as robust as advertised. Additionally, SSO and several other features sometimes went down.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We have had no issues scaling it.
How are customer service and technical support?
Customer Service:
6/10
Technical Support:6/10
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We previously used version X3-4 and upgraded to the current version.
How was the initial setup?
It is an environment which runs partly via bare metal and partly via hypervisor technology, and this type of installation cannot be simple. It is also an engineered system, which means that there are a lot of tweaks that enhance it a lot, but they aren't easy. There's a rather high entry point for just setting it up.
What about the implementation team?
We used both vendor and in-house teams for the implementation. First, we implemented OMCS and then, after several months, the rest of the DTAP environment. This was also the case with the functional servers (individual VM’s).
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
It was a little bit of a black box for me. It costs millions for the hardware and software licenses. However, the overall system runs five times faster than it did on IBM hardware.
What other advice do I have?
It is a great solution for an application server.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Dy. System Manager at a tech company with 10,001+ employees
The virtualization, especially vUser creation, is the most valuable feature for us. Reporting and bug fixes should be applied for this product on-time.
What is most valuable?
The virtualization, especially vUser creation, is the most valuable feature for us.
How has it helped my organization?
Flexibility on server creation and deployment are much easier on this machine.
What needs improvement?
Reporting and bug fixes should be applied for this product on-time.
For how long have I used the solution?
We are the end customer and are managing Exalogic for our customer, and it's been in place for one-and-a-half years.
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
We had no issues with the deployment.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
We have had issues with the stability as the product failed on its promise for replication of all the components. There was a zpool failure which was exceptionally problematic.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We have had no issues scaling it.
How are customer service and technical support?
Customer Service:
7/10
Technical Support:7/10
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
This is being used in a customer's environment, and I am unsure if they used something previously.
How was the initial setup?
The initial configuration was performed by Oracle before handing over the machine to us.
What about the implementation team?
The first implementation was done by Oracle, and later on we did all the new implementations.
What was our ROI?
The ROI is good, but I would suggest only a high-end customer should go for this as Platinum support is a must.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
This is being used in a customer's environment, and I am unsure if they evaluated anything else.
What other advice do I have?
Certainly buy Platinum support as you will need Oracle's help every now and then.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: We're partners.
Technical Consultant at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
They leverage Infiniband technology, but no kernel tuning has been performed at all.
My experience with Exalogic was as an implementation engineer, and infrastructure architect for a deployment using two Exalogic X4-2 deployments alongside Exadata X2-8's. Across both datacenters, we had nothing but problems - random failures, random reboots, poor performance, and not one advertised metric or feature performing as promised. Notable issues were that the computer nodes would crash for a random, or no, reason at all, taking down the entire node and every VM on it, despite HA/live migration settings being configured. The entire set up was done by Oracle certified consultants, and Oracle leadership was involved in troubleshooting the issues.
I can't think of a single significant issue with performance or stability that was solved in less than nine months, and it is honestly the worst product I have ever dealt with. If anything, a "turnkey" solution should at least WORK when the company selling it are the ones who set it up, but my team and I consistently had to teach people that didn't even know the difference between KornShell and BASH BASIC concepts. The VM's only run Oracle Enterprise Linux 5.6, so there's massive security holes out of the box, and the virtualization performance of these VM's is atrocious. The disk read/write caps out at about 40 Mb/s on the VM's because of the eight year old NFS drivers they use to power the back end. They leverage Infiniband technology, but no kernel tuning has been performed at all. We managed to get acceptable performance after hours of my own team's troubleshooting and development, and not a single thing that Oracle did during the entire process was satisfactory.
Hardware failures for this major client were subject to three weeks or more of computer nodes being out of service because Oracle's service techs didn't stock parts in advance. Predictive failure never worked once. The replication of the ZFS system was at a performance level of something five years older, with numerous issues and bugs. I lost track of the number of times something "Shouldn't have happened" when Oracle came to us with excuses.
This happened in two distinct data centers with mirrored setups, so I know it isn't a fluke. This is NOT a product someone wants to deploy in a business that requires reliability and accountability. Oracle didn't deliver on a single advertised feature working properly, and if not for my team, our projects wouldn't have even launched. The admin teams had to work 80+ hours a week just to keep the hardware from self-destructing due to the incredibly shoddy programming, support, and configuration. That's not a "turnkey" system, that's garbage.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.

Buyer's Guide
Download our free Oracle Exalogic [EOL] Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: May 2025
Product Categories
Converged InfrastructureBuyer's Guide
Download our free Oracle Exalogic [EOL] Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- Which Converged Infrastructure solution would have an edge over others?
- What is the difference between converged and hyper-converged infrastructure?
- What are the key differences between converged and hyper-converged solutions?
- When evaluating Converged Infrastructure, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- Why is Converged Infrastructure important for companies?