We performed a comparison between Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) and vCloud Director based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Service Bus topic subscription monitoring turned out to be the most useful for us."
"It offers all the core capabilities we need to manage and monitor our Azure services."
"The most valuable feature of vCloud Director is virtualization."
"The solution is reliable and performs well."
"It optimizes the process for cloud structure."
"vCloud Director is a stable solution."
"vCloud Director works and makes my life easier. Its self-service capabilities allow us to give resources to our customers. They can spin up as many or as few machines as they like, and it works."
"vCloud Director is a stable solution."
"I like the functionality that's available with Orchestrator. The platform stability stuff that I would be involved in worries me from the automation side because you have a lot less hands-on control of things. Price point, it kind of puts us off."
"The most valuable feature of vCloud Director is the scaling architecture that they have built."
"The user interface of Serveress360 could be improved a bit to make the platform even easier to use."
"Addition of more monitoring features to Azure Cosmos DB can be a huge help as we use the same as the main database for our applications."
"In the next release, we would like to see improvements with the pricing. It could be reduced."
"The product could use a billing feature so we can automate billing for clients."
"If you use it for a lot of customers, it is too heavy for this solution."
"It would be beneficial if some features were built into the platform rather than requiring integration with multiple products, reducing complexity and licensing concerns."
"We are having a bit of a problem with vCloud Availability. We know that vRA has a new product, HCX. We would like to know about it, then migrate to the product."
"Technical support is something that we've had problems with in the past. Across all the VMware solutions we have not always had the best response from support. To be fair a lot of the issues that came up for us have been quite niche but it seems that in terms of release cycles they introduced a lot of bugs and it's a lot of stuff that support generally has to work quite hard on. There have been cases when we've logged critical priority issues and not had responses in time. I think support is something that can be worked on."
"It would be beneficial to have enhanced integration capabilities with third-party solutions within vCloud Director, especially in networking and data security."
"Database services need to go beyond what they are currently doing."
Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is ranked 29th in Cloud Management with 2 reviews while vCloud Director is ranked 6th in Cloud Management with 61 reviews. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is rated 9.0, while vCloud Director is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) writes "Great topic subscription monitoring, helpful management, and useful for audits". On the other hand, the top reviewer of vCloud Director writes "Offers flexibility of handling workloads and good scalability". Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is most compared with Azure Monitor, whereas vCloud Director is most compared with VMware Aria Automation, Nutanix Cloud Manager (NCM), VMware Aria Operations, Morpheus and CloudStack. See our Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) vs. vCloud Director report.
See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.