We performed a comparison between TestProject and UiPath Test Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Test Automation Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Since implementing this solution, our code management has been reduced by 40% to 60%."
"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"The ease of web and mobile functional testing is pretty easy on TestProject."
"The automation and AI are very good."
"Ability to carry out automatic testing without having coding knowledge."
"The script-less part of it was good for novice users."
"The console, in a single pane, allows us to understand where we are in the testing environment."
"We also don't develop test robots like typing codes; we program them with drag-and-drop features."
"It facilitates the delegation of control to multiple users and offers an efficient way to organize tasks using labels."
"It's effective at testing whatever automation we've built or making sure the automation we've built is working fine."
"It's useful for automating tasks."
"The detailed logging is invaluable."
"UiPath's tools are generally designed for business users, so they can be as simple or as complex as needed."
"We can generate our own workflow. In our case, it is a report on the PDF file. In the reporting category, we generally verify a couple of things and generate a lot of reports at the end of the day. It provides some useful details about the data captured from the PDF that we can put into an Excel file."
"The support is a weak point since they discontinued the tool."
"I and some other experts may be able to understand the solution's reporting system, but a layperson won't understand it."
"Difficult trying to configure on more than one browser."
"In an upcoming release, there should be a SaaS offering available."
"TestProject needs better support for integration with other products to provide a better overall solution for test planning and test data management."
"We'd like to see a direct cloud from TestProject instead of some other third party."
"The product releases sometimes have issues."
"Our primary application is built on Windows, so we've faced no significant challenges. However, I think mobile automation is one area where the solution still needs some work."
"We are facing problems specifically with Desk Manager."
"Orchestrator is not easy to use or understand."
"They could improve the visualization of the product."
"The reporting could be improved. Often, we need to email a report to higher management, we can directly get the report from there. Also, the error reporting could be better."
"UiPath needs to improve its Test Manager feature. Defect management and reporting also need improvement."
"Storing the test scripts is what needs to improve in the UiPath Test Suite, as it's currently a challenge to some extent. Maintaining the files is a bit challenging, especially when you need to keep those locally."
TestProject is ranked 16th in Test Automation Tools with 6 reviews while UiPath Test Suite is ranked 6th in Test Automation Tools with 17 reviews. TestProject is rated 7.2, while UiPath Test Suite is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of TestProject writes "An easy-to-use tool that saves time and functions within a limited budget". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UiPath Test Suite writes "Can be used by non-developers, and saves us time, but the manual testing needs improvement". TestProject is most compared with Katalon Studio, Tricentis Tosca and Testim, whereas UiPath Test Suite is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, OpenText UFT One, SmartBear TestComplete, Katalon Studio and froglogic Squish. See our TestProject vs. UiPath Test Suite report.
See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
