RedSeal vs Tigera comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
RedSeal Logo
30 views|21 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Tigera Logo
248 views|217 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between RedSeal and Tigera based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Risk-Based Vulnerability Management Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing is based on the number of endpoints and devices, and we have seen it range from mid-five figures to low six figures."
  • More RedSeal Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Ranking
    Views
    30
    Comparisons
    21
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    34th
    out of 59 in Container Security
    Views
    248
    Comparisons
    217
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management. Updated: May 2024.
    771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Tigera Canal
    Learn More
    Overview

    RedSeal’s network modeling and risk scoring platform builds an accurate, up-to-date model of an organization’s entire, as-built network to visualize access paths, prioritize what to fix, so you can target existing cybersecurity resources to protect your most valuable assets. With RedSeal’s Digital Resilience Score, decision makers can see the security status and benchmark progress toward digital resilience.

    Tigera is solving the networking and security problems inherent in deploying and enforcing policy in large private, public, and hybrid enterprise clouds. Tigera’s founders combine extensive networking and security experience with a track record of engagement with the cloud native, open source developer and user communities. With this as a starting point, Tigera has worked with those communities to create Canal, the combination and refinement of two existing cloud networking solutions – Project Calico and Flannel.

    Canal provides a software-based networking solution with built-in secure, fine-grained policy control. Canal is targeted at enterprises that are embracing the cloud native model for private, public and hybrid cloud deployments. The Tigera team originated and maintains Project Calico, and is collaborating with CoreOS to maintain Flannel and integrate it with Calico under the Canal umbrella.
    Tigera is based in San Francisco and is backed by leading Silicon Valley investors.

    Sample Customers
    United States Postal Service, Pacific Gas and Electric Co., Interval International
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government21%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Healthcare Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company32%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Insurance Company8%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise75%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise66%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise66%
    Buyer's Guide
    Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management. Updated: May 2024.
    771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    RedSeal is ranked 21st in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management while Tigera is ranked 34th in Container Security. RedSeal is rated 8.2, while Tigera is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of RedSeal writes "Provides a graphical overview of our network and is easy to deploy, but needs a user-friendly interface and a feature for compliance audit policy". On the other hand, RedSeal is most compared with Skybox Security Suite, AlgoSec, FireMon Security Manager, Ekahau Site Survey and Darktrace, whereas Tigera is most compared with Akamai Guardicore Segmentation, Illumio and Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks.

    We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.