Rapid7 InsightAppSec vs Trustwave App Scanner [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Rapid7 Logo
340 views|231 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Trustwave Logo
views| comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Rapid7 InsightAppSec and Trustwave App Scanner [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about HCLTech, OpenText, Rapid7 and others in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST).
To learn more, read our detailed Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) Report (Updated: April 2024).
771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution is stable.""In Rapid7 InsightAppSec, a distinctive feature is the provision of a CDM for integrating web servers and web applications. To establish the connection between these applications, you only need to paste the provided CDN into your metadata. Once connected, every piece of information, including vulnerabilities, can be accessed. It also offers demo sessions.""It uses a signature-based method to check for problems with your code and will provide an alert if anything is found.""The product’s most valuable feature is UI. It is easy to manage and find vulnerabilities in the application.""It is a very robust solution.""The initial setup for us was easy enough. We didn't face too many issues. Deployment took maybe 30 minutes. It's quite quick and doesn't cause too much trouble at the outset.""You have various attack modules, and you also have the Attack Replay feature for the attack sequence. You can reproduce an attack and see it. That is a very good feature I noticed in this solution. It helps developers as well.""The most valuable feature of this solution is the graphical interface."

More Rapid7 InsightAppSec Pros →

"The stability is great. We haven't had any issues at all with it."

More Trustwave App Scanner [EOL] Pros →

Cons
"The product’s pricing could be flexible.""We get a lot of false positives during the tests.""The reporting is definitely an aspect of the solution that's in need of some work. We found that we'd try to use widgets, but often getting them to work for us wasn't very clear. They need to be more user friendly or offer better instructions.""The interface should be a little bit easier to manage. Sometimes, the logic that they use is kind of strange. They need to work a little bit more on their interface to make it more understandable. The interface is the only problem. I'm using Rapid7, which is very intuitive. There are other applications available in the market with a better interface. They can include more techniques or options to test different types of security because the templates are limited. It would be great to see them follow the MITRE ATT&CK framework or what is there in tools like Veracode and Synopsys.""I would like more details of what the product can do.""The only concern I have with Rapid7 is that it does not provide enough information about vulnerabilities within AppSec.""Rapid7 InsightAppSec needs improvement in detecting phishing pages.""In the future, if they can have integration with a lot of ticketing systems then it would be amazing."

More Rapid7 InsightAppSec Cons →

"I would like to see a little more flexibility with regards to setting up profiles for vulnerabilities."

More Trustwave App Scanner [EOL] Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The price of this product is very cheap."
  • "They offer a good price, but I don't remember its cost. It is fair as compared to the competition. We have opted for project-based licensing, not user-based. We can add any number of users. That doesn't matter. It is worth the money."
  • "Its price is competitive. It is not expensive."
  • "I'm not sure how much it costs exactly, but I know it's expensive."
  • "I rate Rapid7 InsightAppSec’s pricing an eight out of ten."
  • "Rapid7 InsightAppSec is cheap."
  • More Rapid7 InsightAppSec Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) solutions are best for your needs.
    771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:In Rapid7 InsightAppSec, a distinctive feature is the provision of a CDM for integrating web servers and web applications. To establish the connection between these applications, you only need to… more »
    Top Answer:Rapid7 InsightAppSec needs improvement in detecting phishing pages.
    Top Answer:I use the solution to check multiple websites, particularly dynamic and e-commerce websites, for vulnerabilities within the code. The tool helps identify any vulnerabilities present in the code… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    340
    Comparisons
    231
    Reviews
    8
    Average Words per Review
    482
    Rating
    8.3
    Unranked
    In Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    InsightAppSec
    Hailstorm, Cenzic Hailstorm
    Learn More
    Overview

    Your web applications may be complex, but your application security testing tool doesn’t need to be. InsightAppSec brings Rapid7’s proven Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) technology to the Insight platform, combining powerful application crawling and attack capabilities, flexibility in scan scope and scheduling, and accuracy in results with a modern UI, intuitive workflows, and sensible data organization. This enables you to identify XSS, SQL injection, CSRF, and other vulnerabilities with unparalleled ease. The best part? All of these capabilities are delivered via the cloud so that you’re up and running in minutes to identify the critical security risks that exist in your applications.

    Provides ability to test applications for security vulnerabilities, security policies and regulatory compliance.
    Sample Customers
    CenterPoint Energy, CPA Australia, Hypertherm, First American Financial Corporation, Rackspace
    Leading Health Insurer
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Healthcare Company29%
    Computer Software Company29%
    Comms Service Provider14%
    Printing Company14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company21%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Government7%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business55%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise27%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise64%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about HCLTech, OpenText, Rapid7 and others in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST). Updated: April 2024.
    771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Rapid7 InsightAppSec is ranked 3rd in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) with 12 reviews while Trustwave App Scanner [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST). Rapid7 InsightAppSec is rated 8.6, while Trustwave App Scanner [EOL] is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Rapid7 InsightAppSec writes "A highly scalable and robust product that enables users to automate scans". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trustwave App Scanner [EOL] writes "It helps us troubleshoot failed scans and incomplete statuses". Rapid7 InsightAppSec is most compared with Rapid7 AppSpider, OWASP Zap, PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional, Fortify WebInspect and Acunetix, whereas Trustwave App Scanner [EOL] is most compared with .

    We monitor all Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.