• Home
  • PernixData FVP [EOL] vs. Red Hat Ceph Storage

PernixData FVP [EOL] vs Red Hat Ceph Storage comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Nutanix Logo
PernixData FVP [EOL]
Read 7 PernixData FVP [EOL] reviews
views| comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Red Hat Logo
Red Hat Ceph Storage
Read 22 Red Hat Ceph Storage reviews
4,181 views|3,525 comparisons
80% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Software Defined Storage (SDS)
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between PernixData FVP [EOL] and Red Hat Ceph Storage based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about StarWind, Nutanix, Red Hat and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS).
To learn more, read our detailed Software Defined Storage (SDS) Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
By adding storage intelligence at the server tier, it enables an architecture decoupling storage performance from capacity to utilize high speed server media in conjunction with any shared storage.
Prajwal Kabbinale
Overall satisfied , with easy implementation ,having a notification feature would be helpful
We use both Red Hat Ceph and Azure storage, for all staging and non-production.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The other big advantage is that Ceph is free software. Compared to traditional SAN based storage, it is very economical."
  • "There is no cost for software."
  • "Most of time, you can get Ceph with the OpenStack solution in a subscription​​ as a bundle.​"
  • "We never used the paid support."
  • "If you can afford a product like Red Hat Ceph Storage then go for it. If you cannot, then you need to test Ceph and get your hands dirty."
  • "The price of this product isn't high."
  • "The price of Red Hat Ceph Storage is reasonable."
  • "The operational overhead is higher compared to Azure because we own the hardware."

    • More Red Hat Ceph Storage Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Defined Storage (SDS) solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    How does Red Hat Ceph Storage compare with MiniO?
    Top Answer:Red Hat Ceph does well in simplifying storage integration by replacing the need for numerous storage solutions. This solution allows for multiple copies of replicated and coded pools to be kept, easy… more »
    What do you like most about Red Hat Ceph Storage?
    Top Answer:The high availability of the solution is important to us.
    Read all 10 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Red Hat Ceph Storage?
    Top Answer:Some documentation is very hard to find. The documentation must be quickly available.
    Read all 10 answers   →
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Software Defined Storage (SDS)
    3rd
    out of 37 in Software Defined Storage (SDS)
    Views
    4,181
    Comparisons
    3,525
    Reviews
    9
    Average Words per Review
    330
    Rating
    7.7
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Ceph
    Learn More
    Nutanix
    Video Not Available
    Red Hat
    Overview
    PernixData FVP software is a 100% software solution that clusters server flash and RAM to create a low latency I/O acceleration tier for any shared storage environment.
    Red Hat Ceph Storage is an enterprise open source platform that provides unified software-defined storage on standard, economical servers and disks. With block, object, and file storage combined into one platform, Red Hat Ceph Storage efficiently and automatically manages all your data.
    Sample Customers
    GKL Marketing-Marktforschung, University Hospital Leipzig
    Dell, DreamHost
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business86%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business37%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise48%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise60%
    Buyer's Guide
    Software Defined Storage (SDS)
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about StarWind, Nutanix, Red Hat and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS). Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    PernixData FVP [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Software Defined Storage (SDS) while Red Hat Ceph Storage is ranked 3rd in Software Defined Storage (SDS) with 22 reviews. PernixData FVP [EOL] is rated 8.6, while Red Hat Ceph Storage is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of PernixData FVP [EOL] writes "By adding storage intelligence at the server tier, it enables an architecture decoupling storage performance from capacity to utilize high speed server media in conjunction with any shared storage". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Ceph Storage writes "Provides block storage and object storage from the same storage cluster". PernixData FVP [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Red Hat Ceph Storage is most compared with MinIO, VMware vSAN, Portworx Enterprise, Pure Storage FlashBlade and NetApp StorageGRID.

    See our list of best Software Defined Storage (SDS) vendors.

    We monitor all Software Defined Storage (SDS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.