We performed a comparison between Oracle Database Appliance and Teradata Cloud Data Warehouse based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Warehouse solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I give it a nine out of 10 because it gives the customer easy access to a complete database solution within 30 minutes."
"The performance of the system is the solution's most valuable aspect. In combination with the database, it gives perfect results. It's a better system than using other kinds of integrated systems. In general, the ODA control is much simpler to use and offers up the best performance."
"Oracle Database Appliances are specifically designed for Oracle databases. They have built-in utilities and tools that simplify management, making them the best option for Oracle database management systems."
"The Oracle database is able to get the data, process it, and return it to the company's CEO's and CFO's within a single day, and thus they are able to find out yesterday's P and L by today. It has drastically reduced the amount and time of processing from seven days to one day."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the ability to combine all the data without the need for additional devices."
"We value the appliance architecture with its “everything-in-a-box” highly standardized setup."
"The product’s valuable feature is its capability to pre-configure and pre-install the settings."
"The product is excellent. It is simple and reliable in terms of installation and maintenance."
"The cloud is ten times better than physical hardware; it is more cost-effective and the upgrade process is ten times easier."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of running queries."
"The product is reliable."
"We would like the ability to add more storage without having to upgrade to Oracle Exadata."
"The feature that I would like to see improve is the interface. It is really not good. I almost have to work on script by script in it. There is always some issue with the user interface."
"It would be beneficial to have dedicated RAM included in the Oracle Database Appliance."
"The setup is a bit complex."
"The license cost could be cheaper, especially for long-term contracts."
"Oracle could improve its capacity for built-in visualization."
"I would like it if the scalability could be increased without having to change versions."
"Virtualization needs improvement. It's not easy to back up the virtual machines in the Oracle VM architecture. I would also like to see native support for Veeam Backup Software."
"It could be a bit more user-friendly."
"Stability-wise, we have had some issues with automation and the ability to handle large datasets."
"The cost of Teradata Cloud Data Warehouse has room for improvement."
More Teradata Cloud Data Warehouse Pricing and Cost Advice →
Oracle Database Appliance is ranked 6th in Data Warehouse with 40 reviews while Teradata Cloud Data Warehouse is ranked 13th in Cloud Data Warehouse with 3 reviews. Oracle Database Appliance is rated 8.0, while Teradata Cloud Data Warehouse is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Oracle Database Appliance writes "Simplifies database management tasks and provides high availability and disaster recovery". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Teradata Cloud Data Warehouse writes "Is quick, easy to upgrade, and cost-effective". Oracle Database Appliance is most compared with Oracle Exadata, VMware Tanzu Greenplum, Dremio, Actian Ingres and Vertica, whereas Teradata Cloud Data Warehouse is most compared with Snowflake, Amazon Redshift, Teradata, Oracle Exadata and Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics. See our Oracle Database Appliance vs. Teradata Cloud Data Warehouse report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Warehouse vendors and best Data Warehouse vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Warehouse reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
