We performed a comparison between OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise and Spirent Avalanche based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, OpenText, Tricentis and others in Performance Testing Tools."The user interface is fine."
"It allows you to work out how well you are doing project-wise because you see the number of scripts done, the number of tests run, and whether you have mapped all your requirements to it."
"The solution is a very user-friendly tool, especially when you compare it to a competitor like BlazeMeter."
"The product is very user-friendly."
"You can test a huge variety of applications, not just web-based systems, but SAP, Oracle, web services, pretty much anything out in the market place, but it's mobile-based testing."
"I think the number one feature everybody likes is the capability to easily generate virtual users as well as the reporting."
"We haven't had an outage since we started using the solution."
"What we call the LoadRunner analysis is the most useful aspect of the solution."
"I find network traffic testing the most valuable feature."
"It is tough to maintain from the infrastructure side."
"The worst thing about it is it did not have zero footprint on your PC."
"The product's scalability must be improved."
"It's not that popular on the cloud."
"OpenText needs to improve in terms of support. With the same support plan but when the product was owned by HP, support was more responsive and better coordinated."
"OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise doesn't support some mainframe protocols. We had to build scripts to access the interface."
"Offering a direct integration feature would ensure a completely smooth experience."
"The TruClient protocol works well but it takes a lot of memory to run those tests, which is something that can be improved."
"The solution could improve by increasing the Gbps speeds and by having better support for storage."
More OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise is ranked 5th in Performance Testing Tools with 81 reviews while Spirent Avalanche is ranked 17th in Performance Testing Tools. OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise is rated 8.4, while Spirent Avalanche is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise writes "Saves time and effort, and makes it easy to set up scenarios and execute tests". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Spirent Avalanche writes "Quality traffic testing and is reasonably priced". OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise is most compared with OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, OpenText LoadRunner Professional, OpenText Silk Performer, Tricentis NeoLoad and Apache JMeter, whereas Spirent Avalanche is most compared with Ixia IxLoad, Apache JMeter and OpenText LoadRunner Professional.
See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
