We performed a comparison between OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise and Original Software Qualify based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, OpenText, Tricentis and others in Performance Testing Tools."IP Spoofing can be done using Performance Center."
"The most beneficial features of the solution are flexibility and versatility in their performance."
"The initial setup was straightforward. I was able to download everything myself without any IT support."
"For me, the test coverage and the performance and load testing aspects are valuable."
"Now that LoadRunner integrates with Dynatrace and other monitoring tools, it simplifies the process of integration into a company, taking merely five minutes to set up. This ease of integration allows for quick comparison of monitoring and performance results, a feature I highly appreciate."
"LoadRunner Enterprise's best feature is the detailed reporting structure."
"The solution supports a number of protocols."
"The tool's most valuable features are scripting, correlations, and parameterization. Debugging is also easy."
"Flexible software with multiple functions, e.g. scenario deployment, new entity creation, workflow creation, etc. Technical support for this software is very good."
"Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise needs to add more features for Citrix performance-based applications testing. This was one of the challenges we observed. Additionally, we experienced some APIs challenges."
"The process of upgrading LoadRunner can be difficult and time-consuming."
"The TruClient protocol works well but it takes a lot of memory to run those tests, which is something that can be improved."
"They had wanted to change the GUI to improve the look and feel. However, since that time, we see a lot of hanging issues."
"We'd like the product to include protocol identifiers whenever a tester wants to test a new application."
"I have seen some users report some issues, but I have personally not had any issues."
"I think better support for cloud-based load generators would help. For example, integrate with Amazon AWS so you can quickly spin up a load generator in the cloud, use it, spin it down."
"More real-time monitoring should be available for the system under test."
"The reporting engine of Original Software Qualify AQM needs to change. It's very difficult to develop complex reports. Its reporting function needs improvement."
More OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise is ranked 5th in Performance Testing Tools with 81 reviews while Original Software Qualify is ranked 35th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise is rated 8.4, while Original Software Qualify is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise writes "Saves time and effort, and makes it easy to set up scenarios and execute tests". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Original Software Qualify writes "Flexible, multifunctional, and stable testing software with good technical support". OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise is most compared with OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, OpenText LoadRunner Professional, OpenText Silk Performer, Tricentis NeoLoad and Apache JMeter, whereas Original Software Qualify is most compared with .
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.