OpenText Business Processing Testing vs Panaya Autonomous SAP Testing [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText Business Processing Testing and Panaya Autonomous SAP Testing [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,065 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Srprogmagr567
Use Panaya Autonomous SAP Testing [EOL]?
Ranking
37th
Views
185
Comparisons
113
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Functional Testing Tools
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
769,065 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Micro Focus Business Process Testing, Business Process Testing, HPE Business Process Testing
Learn More
Overview

OpenText Business Processing Testing (BPT) test framework software will help you move from one-off manual testing and ad hoc functional automated testing to an architected approach with a library of reusable test components. BPT accelerates the move to component-based testing with an integrated test framework approach to creating a repository of reusable test modules that allow for changes to be made once, then propagated across your distributed agile teams to all affected tests.

Panaya Autonomous SAP Testing unties the Goardian knot between successful test cases and manual business knowledge capture, emancipating regression testing of its human factor. Autonomous Testing spans test conception through validation, addressing all aspects of the functional testing lifecycle, including discovery, execution, acceleration and test management. It helps organization reduce time, effort and risk as well as the complexity associated with business process understanding. Powered by innovative machine learning, Autonomous Testing eliminates the pains associated with creating and maintaining manually engineered scripts to enable zero touch test case creation and maintenance. The solution ensures quality teams test the right things by automatically capturing transactions production and converting them into test cases that represent domain expertise. Autonomous Testing eliminates the challenge of business knowledge transfer, ensuring testing mirrors actual user behavior.
Sample Customers
Migros Bank AG
Aritzia, Allianz, Coca-Cola, Clarks, Shiseido
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise71%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
769,065 professionals have used our research since 2012.

OpenText Business Processing Testing is ranked 37th in Functional Testing Tools while Panaya Autonomous SAP Testing [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Functional Testing Tools. OpenText Business Processing Testing is rated 7.8, while Panaya Autonomous SAP Testing [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of OpenText Business Processing Testing writes "Excellent usability, but the solution shouldn't be so tightly integrated with their ALM tool". On the other hand, OpenText Business Processing Testing is most compared with , whereas Panaya Autonomous SAP Testing [EOL] is most compared with Tricentis Tosca and Wikidi Testomato.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.