We performed a comparison between Noname Security and Wallarm NG WAF based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Noname Security, Salt Security, F5 and others in API Security."The most valuable feature of this solution is its integration with API gateways, WAP and with part of their SDLC."
"Helps us to monitor situation in regards to attacks to our sites and prevents a lot of them."
"I think it would be good if they can integrate more with API gateways as this is currently limited."
"The biggest problem for us was the stability and speed using the first version of Wallarm. Now, it is fine."
Earn 20 points
Noname Security is ranked 1st in API Security with 1 review while Wallarm NG WAF is ranked 7th in API Security. Noname Security is rated 8.0, while Wallarm NG WAF is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Noname Security writes "Security platform that offers value through its integration with API gateways". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wallarm NG WAF writes "Active threat detection and adaptive rules are the most valuable for us". Noname Security is most compared with Salt Security, Traceable AI, NGINX App Protect, Akamai API Security and 42Crunch API Security Platform, whereas Wallarm NG WAF is most compared with Salt Security, AWS WAF, F5 Advanced WAF, Cloudflare and Imperva DDoS.
See our list of best API Security vendors.
We monitor all API Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.