We performed a comparison between Microsoft .NET Framework and SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure."The new .NET Core has those middlewares, which are awesome from a security standpoint. With the old Framework or the newer Framework, middleware is basically an event pipeline. You configure and register it, and it handles things centrally. A simple example is logging. With the old Framework, you needed to try/catch blocks everywhere. Here, you configure the logging handler once, and it captures exceptions across the application. I really like the middleware pattern."
"Basically, .NET is simply is the easiest programming language to use, based on my experience."
"Initial setup is straightforward. All the components are readily available."
"When it comes to the user interface, the context is better than other tools because it is easier to use."
"Pre-programmed functions for .NET Framework are widely available."
"Microsoft Platform is the only viable solution when I wish to do something that is not supposed to be cross-platform."
"User-friendly and straightforward."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft .NET Framework is debugging."
"My primary use case for this solution is to display the process in a graphical representation."
"Microsoft has its own product called Blazor, but I don't think it's quite as powerful yet as React or Angular. That's an area for improvement."
".NET Is still heavy or dependant on other Microsoft libraries and frameworks."
"The solution could improve by optimizing the memory for better performance."
"The product's price is an area of concern, making it an area where improvements are required."
"It would be nice if the framework were able to work with additional environments and systems like Linux."
"The runtime environment for ASP.NET needs improvement to make it more universal."
"Better integration with other tools to make the operation faster would be an improvement."
"Microsoft .NET Framework has a steep learning curve, which could be improved."
"The odata can be improved. It represents to users flexible process that can manage and monitor their own business process."
Earn 20 points
Microsoft .NET Framework is ranked 4th in Application Infrastructure with 47 reviews while SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Infrastructure. Microsoft .NET Framework is rated 8.4, while SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of Microsoft .NET Framework writes "Intuitive, easier to develop, maintain, and migrate from the old framework to newer versions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] writes "Why you should choose SAP BPM as process management discipline?". Microsoft .NET Framework is most compared with IIS, Magic xpa Application Platform, JBoss Enterprise Application Platform, Apache Web Server and Windows Process Activation Services, whereas SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.