• Home
  • MicroPact vs. Triaster

MicroPact vs Triaster comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
MicroPact Logo

MicroPact

217 views|76 comparisons
Triaster Logo

Triaster

86 views|68 comparisons
Buyer's Guide
Business Process Management (BPM)
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between MicroPact and Triaster based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM).
To learn more, read our detailed Business Process Management (BPM) Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
769,065 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
55th
out of 93 in Business Process Management (BPM)
Views
217
Comparisons
76
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
67th
out of 93 in Business Process Management (BPM)
Views
86
Comparisons
68
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Business Process Management (BPM)
March 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM). Updated: March 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
769,065 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
MicroPact
Video Not Available
Triaster
Overview

For nearly four decades, MicroPact has focused on engineering web-based, commercial off the shelf (COTS) solutions for US Government agencies and Fortune 500 corporations. Today MicroPact solutions serve 97% of federal agencies with 500 or more employees, 98% of U.S. state governments, and enjoy a 97% annual renewal rate.

MicroPact has one focus: to provide customers with the best experience through the most efficient technology from the most talented people in the world. We facilitate transformation by being a disruptor —­ by putting control and transformational power in the hands of our customers in the form of open architecture, open standard, platform independent case management and BPM technology. 

Each of the Triaster systems deliver an (or several) easy to understand, easy to use, secure websites, intelligently presenting all your processes, policies, forms and guidance documents. We call these Process Libraries.

Triaster know that the design of the Process Library homepage is key for its uptake by end-users; therefore, we offer a bespoke design service, included as standard for new customers, to ensure your design reflects your business and how you work.

Sample Customers
Department of Defense, Department of Justice, General Services Administration, Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Internal Revenue Service, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Veterans Affairs, Norfolk Southern, CSX, The University of British Columbia Faculty of Medicine, Georgia State University, University of Texas, East Carolina University
Balfour Beatty, Fugro, Microsoft, Skanska, AA, Interserve
Buyer's Guide
Business Process Management (BPM)
March 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM). Updated: March 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
769,065 professionals have used our research since 2012.

MicroPact is ranked 55th in Business Process Management (BPM) while Triaster is ranked 67th in Business Process Management (BPM). MicroPact is rated 0.0, while Triaster is rated 0.0. On the other hand, MicroPact is most compared with , whereas Triaster is most compared with .

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.