LookingGlass Manage Intelligence vs ThreatQ comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
LookingGlass Logo
82 views|66 comparisons
ThreatQuotient Logo
843 views|610 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between LookingGlass Manage Intelligence and ThreatQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Recorded Future, Check Point Software Technologies, Microsoft and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms.
To learn more, read our detailed Threat Intelligence Platforms Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,065 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use LookingGlass Manage Intelligence?
Anonymous User
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
769,065 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:Integrating the solution with our existing security tools and workflows was easy.
Top Answer:The tool is not user-friendly. It is not beginner-friendly. It would be very difficult for a beginner to learn the tool. It will take at least two months to get familiar with it. Building the playbook… more »
Top Answer:We used the solution for threat mapping and managing IoCs.
Ranking
Views
82
Comparisons
66
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
843
Comparisons
610
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
ScoutVision, ScoutPrime, LookingGlass Cyber Threat Center, LookingGlass CTC, LookingGlass Cyber Solutions
Learn More
LookingGlass
Video Not Available
ThreatQuotient
Video Not Available
Overview

LookingGlass Managed Threat Intelligence combines broad structured threat data feeds and incidents of compromise (IOCs) with multi-source collection across the surface, social, Deep and Dark Web. Our managed service utilizes advanced content scoring and round-the-clock human vetting to deliver timely, relevant, and actionable intelligence across the entire spectrum of risks indicated online.

ThreatQ is a Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) designed to enable threat operations and management. ThreatQ is the only solution with an integrated Threat Library, Adaptive Workbench and Open Exchange that help you to act upon the most relevant threats facing your organization and to get more out of your existing security infrastructure.

Sample Customers
PROTEGE PARTNERS L L C, Peridot Solutions
Radar, Bitdefender, Crowdstrike, FireEye, IBM Security
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm21%
Computer Software Company14%
Government9%
Educational Organization9%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise76%
Buyer's Guide
Threat Intelligence Platforms
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Recorded Future, Check Point Software Technologies, Microsoft and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms. Updated: April 2024.
769,065 professionals have used our research since 2012.

LookingGlass Manage Intelligence is ranked 44th in Threat Intelligence Platforms while ThreatQ is ranked 16th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 2 reviews. LookingGlass Manage Intelligence is rated 0.0, while ThreatQ is rated 7.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of ThreatQ writes "Improves the threat intelligence gathering process, but it is not user-friendly". LookingGlass Manage Intelligence is most compared with , whereas ThreatQ is most compared with ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP), Anomali ThreatStream, Recorded Future, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR and CrowdStrike Falcon.

See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.