We performed a comparison between LANDesk Systems Lifecycle Management [EOL] and NetCrunch based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Microsoft, ServiceNow and others in Server Monitoring.LANDesk Systems Lifecycle Management [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Server Monitoring while NetCrunch is ranked 25th in Server Monitoring. LANDesk Systems Lifecycle Management [EOL] is rated 0.0, while NetCrunch is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetCrunch writes "A network monitoring platform with a useful reporting feature, but permission-based options could be better". LANDesk Systems Lifecycle Management [EOL] is most compared with , whereas NetCrunch is most compared with Zabbix, PRTG Network Monitor and Fortinet FortiSIEM.
See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.