We performed a comparison between Informatica Cloud Test Data Management and Informatica Test Data Management (TDM) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Delphix, Broadcom, DATPROF and others in Test Data Management."One of the most valuable features is that I don't need to buy a subscription for any functionality. With Informatica Cloud Data Management, I have all the functionality and features available. If I need to make an integration, I can go to that integration service. If I need to mask, provide, or clean some information, I can easily just pick up that feature and use it. It's very simple, and I have all the functions and capabilities I need to work with data."
"The solution's scalability is high."
"Informatica Test Data Management is a complete solution. I'm not very deep in the technical aspect of the solution, but most of the workflows are now completely automated. There are some minor elements where we have to still add manual parts to the implementation."
"The tool enabled us to leverage Teradata Parallel Transporter to write the masked data efficiently to our Teradata warehouse."
"Organizations working on different projects can benefit from this tool."
"One thing Informatica could improve is the way IPUs are used. Each customer purchases a certain amount of IPUs per month, but you can use more or less than that defined quantity. The only problem is if you don't use the all your IPUs, they don't carry over into the next month. I think customers should have the ability to transfer unused IPUs into the next month or year. This improvement could help give customers more flexibility, especially since cloud solutions need flexibility in how we use and pay for them."
"Its cloud-based version has a few limitations compared to the on-premise version."
"Probably the ideal time testing site, utilizing self-service for real-time testing, could be an area for improvement."
"Informatica has a data governance suite, and at the moment, there is no connection between the data governance elements, such as the data catalog, and the Informatica Test Data Management software. For example, the data discovery which is part of both solutions is two separate things. If you have a data discovery in the data catalog, then we cannot use it for Informatica Test Data Management purposes and vice versa. The same software vendor, has two different products, with the same functionality. There's was no need to separate things. This is something which was a problem in a use case of the customer where this was the reason why they didn't choose the Informatica solution."
"The UI experience is a little bit old. When applying more than 80 columns, it means doing it in phases, as it won't allow it in one go."
More Informatica Cloud Test Data Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Informatica Test Data Management (TDM) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Informatica Cloud Test Data Management is ranked 10th in Test Data Management with 2 reviews while Informatica Test Data Management (TDM) is ranked 5th in Test Data Management with 10 reviews. Informatica Cloud Test Data Management is rated 8.6, while Informatica Test Data Management (TDM) is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Informatica Cloud Test Data Management writes "Has good stability and an easy initial setup process". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Informatica Test Data Management (TDM) writes "Beneficial for test cycle efficiency and scalability, but challenges exist in terms of technical support and user interface". Informatica Cloud Test Data Management is most compared with , whereas Informatica Test Data Management (TDM) is most compared with Delphix, Tricentis Tosca, Broadcom Test Data Manager, IBM InfoSphere Optim Test Data Management (TDM) and K2View.
See our list of best Test Data Management vendors.
We monitor all Test Data Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
