We performed a comparison between IBM Tivoli CDP for Files and Reduxio [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Zerto, Commvault and others in Backup and Recovery."The restoration and infrastructure is extremely reliable."
"By using the BackDating option we can restore volumes based on time. It also reduces volumes and maintenance time."
"Reduxio delivers a self-contained system with all of the features rolled in and functional."
"I like the performance. I think it's what you call a hybrid SAN. It has solid state drives and, of course, regular optical drives, which would make performance a lot better, faster."
"We can offer a lot more storage to our end users."
"The whole product is based on point-in-time restore capabilities built into their storage appliance, and no one else I know does that."
"We are able to recover to the second, if needed, our data. This greatly improves restore capability, for example, if there is a cryptolocker outbreak or data loss."
"The machine has been easy to use."
"We are getting 4.4:1 data reduction, which means we will be able to squeeze over 120TB into 2U. This is more than enough capacity for us."
"We would like to have the opportunity to omit data from being backed up. For example, we have three virtual machines, each with three disks. When running the backup, it will automatically take each disk rather than allowing us to select what data we want backed."
"Would love to have role-based access and an active directory integration."
"Scalability. Reduxio has only one product, they don’t have an option, for now, to expand the storage product."
"Integration is needed with other virtual vendors like VMware, Veeam, Hyper-V; that integration needs to be deeper, not just the way that they're using it now. I know that it's under development, but I think this is one of the disadvantages, for now, as a young company. They have to work with the other players on the market."
"Maybe it should come in stainless steel, just like its DeLorean time machine predecessor."
"I am waiting for the vSphere Plug-In with individual VM level control."
"Needs some hooks into cloud storage for backup. Also they should update the system to use additional secondary storage as a resource."
"Needs to be made easier to use with slightly older versions of VMware."
"the only thing I would say negative about Reduxio is the cabling was a little bit confusing at first, but now that we understand it, it's easy. It was just so different from what we've seen before. That was the only hard part to get used to. The storage array is fully redundant, so there are some cross-connect cables that you have to run, from the A side to the B side, and the B side back to the A side, and we've just never seen anything like that before. But now that I understand the design, it makes complete sense. But initially it was confusing."
IBM Tivoli CDP for Files is ranked 63rd in Backup and Recovery while Reduxio [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Backup and Recovery. IBM Tivoli CDP for Files is rated 9.0, while Reduxio [EOL] is rated 9.8. The top reviewer of IBM Tivoli CDP for Files writes "Restoration and infrastructure are extremely reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Reduxio [EOL] writes "Its access speed and now its recently released features makes Reduxio not only an equal, but also better than your older version SANs". IBM Tivoli CDP for Files is most compared with Commvault Cloud, Arcserve UDP and IBM Spectrum Protect, whereas Reduxio [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
