We performed a comparison between HPE Eucalyptus and Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable aspect of the solution is the interface on the console."
"It offers all the core capabilities we need to manage and monitor our Azure services."
"Service Bus topic subscription monitoring turned out to be the most useful for us."
"The customization should be improved."
"The user interface of Serveress360 could be improved a bit to make the platform even easier to use."
"Addition of more monitoring features to Azure Cosmos DB can be a huge help as we use the same as the main database for our applications."
HPE Eucalyptus is ranked 38th in Cloud Management while Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is ranked 29th in Cloud Management with 2 reviews. HPE Eucalyptus is rated 7.0, while Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of HPE Eucalyptus writes "Good interface, and an easy initial setup with good community support on the free version". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) writes "Great topic subscription monitoring, helpful management, and useful for audits". HPE Eucalyptus is most compared with OpenNebula, whereas Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is most compared with Azure Monitor. See our HPE Eucalyptus vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) report.
See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.