Gurucul UEBA vs Splunk User Behavior Analytics comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Gurucul Logo
1,283 views|253 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Splunk Logo
2,321 views|1,443 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Gurucul UEBA and Splunk User Behavior Analytics based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Gurucul UEBA vs. Splunk User Behavior Analytics Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"I appreciate the comprehensive categorization of devices based on their intended use, such as those for DNS.""The reporting feature was the key differentiator. I also liked the ability to create dynamic rules in the environment.""The most valuable feature of Gurucul is the ability to customize and it is on the Hadoop platform that has a lot of flexibility."

More Gurucul UEBA Pros →

"Because of some of the visualizations that we utilize, we are able to understand strange, unusual traffic on our networks.""The solution is extremely scalable. Our customers are regularly scaling up after installing Splunk.""It's easily scalable.""The most valuable feature is the ability to search through a large amount of data.""The solution is definitely scalable.""The most valuable feature is being able to take data and put it into other systems so that we could see the output, and to see where we need to apply our focus.""It is a solution that helps test and measure customer satisfaction.""This intelligent user behavior analytics package is easy to configure and use while remaining feature filled."

More Splunk User Behavior Analytics Pros →

Cons
"It could be more stable.""Gurucul can improve on the online documentation. They should educate the end users more to allow them to do everything themselves.""Regarding the prioritization of threats, Gurucul UEBA needs to enhance its alert severity assignment process within the system."

More Gurucul UEBA Cons →

"In the future I would like to see simplified statistics and analytical threats.""We want to have an automated system for bot hunting that enables us to detect anomalies predictively based on historical data. It would be helpful if Splunk included process mining as an alternative option. We have a threat workflow, but it would be useful if we could supplement that with some process mining capabilities over time.""The initial setup was complex because some of the configurations that we required needed customization.""I would like improved downward integration with other tools such as McAfee and other GCP solutions.""The solution is much more expensive than relative competitors like ArcSight or LogRhythm. It makes it hard to sell to customers sometimes.""They should work to add more built-in correlation searches and more use cases based on worldwide customer experiences. They need more ready-made use cases.""If the price was lowered and the setup process was less complex, I would consider rating it higher.""Currently, a lot of network operations need improvement. We still need people to handle incidents. Our vision is to leverage status and convert it directly from the network devices. It would be ideal if we could take action using APIs and API code and remove manual processes."

More Splunk User Behavior Analytics Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The price is fair. In fact, I believe it was on the cheaper side when compared to the competition."
  • "The price of Gurucul is competitive."
  • More Gurucul UEBA Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I hope we can increase the free license to be more than 5 gig a day. This would help people who want to introduce a POC or a demo license for the solution."
  • "My biggest complaint is the way they do pricing... You can never know the pricing for next year. Every single time you adjust to something new, the price goes up. It's impossible to truly budget for it. It goes up constantly."
  • "There are additional costs associated with the integrator."
  • "The licensing costs is around 10,000 dollars."
  • "Pricing varies based on the packages you choose and the volume of your usage."
  • "I am not aware of the price, but it is expensive."
  • More Splunk User Behavior Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I appreciate the comprehensive categorization of devices based on their intended use, such as those for DNS.
    Top Answer:The price of Gurucul is competitive. I rate the price of Gurucul a three out of five.
    Top Answer:Regarding the prioritization of threats, Gurucul UEBA needs to enhance its alert severity assignment process within the system. This is one area where Gurucul UEBA could improve. Additionally, it… more »
    Top Answer:We are really pleased with Splunk and its features. It would be practically impossible to function without it To provide a general overview of the system, it's important to note that the standard… more »
    Top Answer:I am not aware of the price, but it is expensive. A rough estimate would be around 150 gigabytes, given the huge amount of data. At the moment there are no additional costs for maintenance.
    Top Answer:Currently, we do not have any specific improvement projects in progress. However, we have partnered with some companies that are constantly working on improving the system. Therefore, I believe it's… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    1,283
    Comparisons
    253
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    782
    Rating
    6.5
    Views
    2,321
    Comparisons
    1,443
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    374
    Rating
    8.6
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Caspida, Splunk UBA
    Learn More
    Gurucul
    Video Not Available
    Splunk
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Threats are a moving target. Determined and persistent threat actors purposely stretch out their activity across weeks or even months, especially when most SIEM and XDR solutions are incapable of piecing together events across time. Even worse, is that these solutions primarily use rule-based Machine Learning, which is essentially pattern matching. This makes them especially ineffective in detecting new attacks and/or variants, which are highly successful in breaching organizations. Discover how Gurucul UEBA security can help your enterprise.

    Splunk User Behavior Analytics is a behavior-based threat detection is based on machine learning methodologies that require no signatures or human analysis, enabling multi-entity behavior profiling and peer group analytics for users, devices, service accounts and applications. It detects insider threats and external attacks using out-of-the-box purpose-built that helps organizations find known, unknown and hidden threats, but extensible unsupervised machine learning (ML) algorithms, provides context around the threat via ML driven anomaly correlation and visual mapping of stitched anomalies over various phases of the attack lifecycle (Kill-Chain View). It uses a data science driven approach that produces actionable results with risk ratings and supporting evidence that increases SOC efficiency and supports bi-directional integration with Splunk Enterprise for data ingestion and correlation and with Splunk Enterprise Security for incident scoping, workflow management and automated response. The result is automated, accurate threat and anomaly detection.

    Sample Customers
    Global semi-conductor company
    8 Securities, AAA Western, AdvancedMD, Amaya, Cerner Corporation, CJ O Shopping, CloudShare, Crossroads Foundation, 7-Eleven Indonesia
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Real Estate/Law Firm6%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm44%
    Insurance Company11%
    Government11%
    Security Firm11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Government10%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    Large Enterprise59%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise31%
    Large Enterprise38%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise68%
    Buyer's Guide
    Gurucul UEBA vs. Splunk User Behavior Analytics
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Gurucul UEBA vs. Splunk User Behavior Analytics and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Gurucul UEBA is ranked 11th in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) with 3 reviews while Splunk User Behavior Analytics is ranked 2nd in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) with 17 reviews. Gurucul UEBA is rated 6.6, while Splunk User Behavior Analytics is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Gurucul UEBA writes "Helped reduce our operational costs and increase our efficiency, but it can be more user-friendly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk User Behavior Analytics writes "Easy to configure and easy to use solution that integrates with many applications and scripts ". Gurucul UEBA is most compared with Exabeam Fusion SIEM, Securonix Next-Gen SIEM and Wazuh, whereas Splunk User Behavior Analytics is most compared with Darktrace, Microsoft Defender for Identity, IBM Security QRadar and Varonis Datalert. See our Gurucul UEBA vs. Splunk User Behavior Analytics report.

    See our list of best User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) vendors.

    We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.