We performed a comparison between Google Cloud Security Command Center and SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, Microsoft and others in Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP)."It simplifies compliance efforts."
"The compliance reporting feature helped us maintain a baseline of compliance within the information security policies."
"The UI is very good."
"PingSafe can integrate all your cloud accounts and resources you create in the AWS account, We have set it up to scan the AWS transfer services, EC2, security groups, and GitHub."
"It is pretty easy to integrate with this platform. When properly integrated, it monitors end-to-end."
"The most valuable features of PingSafe are the asset inventory and issue indexing."
"The UI is responsive and user-friendly."
"There's real-time threat detection. It can show threats and find issues based on their severity and helps us with real-time monitoring."
"The user interface is well-designed and easy to navigate."
"PingSafe's most valuable feature is its unified console."
"Visibility can be improved along with automation."
"It would be really helpful if the solution improves its agent deployment process."
"here is a bit of a learning curve. However, you only need two to three days to identify options and get accustomed."
"We use PingSafe and also SentinelOne. If PingSafe integrated some of the endpoint security features of SentinelOne, it would be the perfect one-stop solution for everything. We wouldn't need to switch between the products. At my organization, I am responsible for endpoint security and vulnerability management. Integrating both functions into one application would be ideal because I could see all the alerts, heat maps, and reports in one console."
"For vulnerabilities, they are showing CVE ID. The naming convention should be better so that it indicates the container where a vulnerability is present. Currently, they are only showing CVE ID, but the same CVE ID might be present in multiple containers. We would like to have the container name so that we can easily fix the issue."
"There is room for improvement in the current active licensing model for PingSafe."
"PingSafe takes four to five hours to detect and highlight an issue, and that time should be reduced."
"There is a bit of a learning curve for new users."
"Some of the navigation and some aspects of the portal may be a little bit confusing."
More Google Cloud Security Command Center Pricing and Cost Advice →
More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Google Cloud Security Command Center is ranked 17th in Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) with 2 reviews while SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is ranked 5th in Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) with 67 reviews. Google Cloud Security Command Center is rated 8.0, while SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Google Cloud Security Command Center writes "Provides visibility, address cloud misconfiguration and prevent threats ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security writes "Provides excellent workload telemetry, hunting capabilities, and deep visibility ". Google Cloud Security Command Center is most compared with Wiz, Microsoft Defender for Cloud and Orca Security, whereas SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, Orca Security, AWS GuardDuty and Qualys VMDR.
See our list of best Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) vendors.
We monitor all Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
