We performed a comparison between Galvanize IncidentBond and VMware Carbon Black Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, ServiceNow, IBM and others in Security Incident Response."The customization and the transparency of data while still maintaining a mostly user-friendly UI, are key features. It allows for me, as an engineer, to evolve the individual components and modules, and to create a much more meaningful picture than the individual pieces in isolation ever could."
"The market information they gather from the community is really good. Their configuration capabilities are good."
"The enhanced logging and data analysis of the incident response and investigation components allowed us to quickly identify and resolve security issues before they could spread."
"They're highly stable in comparison with other solutions I have."
"Integration and scalability are the most valuable."
"The solution does very well as a baseline EDR and provides good process-level management."
"Carbon Black Cb Response excels at providing context to indicators when responding to incidents. It allows responders to understand the entire scope of an incident and quickly contain it to minimize impact and disruption."
"Carbon Black insures the probability that any ransomware will be stopped before spreading."
"The most valuable feature is its ability to seek out abnormal activity and to create alerts."
"Stable – Release – Experimental" system with their releases, and all the proper checks and balances, I’d be an incredibly happy individual. I can appreciate the cause and affect, wherein the customization of the tool drives rapid release schedules, and the paradox that creates with the idea of stable releases. I’d also like more transparency about known bugs and issues."
"Training and education for both partner and customer, including product marketing need to be improved."
"The solution needs to simplify the process of adding custom watchlists, as well as embrace YARA for rule creation."
"The product detects too many false positives initially and it could integrate better with other security solutions."
"It's not highly available, so you have to have a core server. If the primary server goes down, you need a new one. It's not available at the same time, however. It's not automatically swapped from one server to another."
"One area for improvement is the maturity of its vulnerability features."
"The cloud console has a lot of bugs and issues in the analysis part."
"The threat intelligence feed could use some fine tweaking."
"The biggest issue I encountered was one where old logs were not being overwritten as expected so the system drive kept filling up from time to time. However, support was usually quite responsive and happy to jump on a remote session to take a look at it for us. That log bug has probably been resolved with an update by now."
Earn 20 points
Galvanize IncidentBond is ranked 11th in Security Incident Response while VMware Carbon Black Cloud is ranked 2nd in Security Incident Response with 18 reviews. Galvanize IncidentBond is rated 9.0, while VMware Carbon Black Cloud is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Galvanize IncidentBond writes "Customization and transparency of data, while maintaining a mostly user-friendly UI". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Carbon Black Cloud writes " Shows promise for endpoint detection and response, with room for improvement in complexity and pricing ". Galvanize IncidentBond is most compared with , whereas VMware Carbon Black Cloud is most compared with VMware Carbon Black Endpoint, Fidelis Elevate, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR and Rapid7 InsightIDR.
See our list of best Security Incident Response vendors.
We monitor all Security Incident Response reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.