Epicor LumberTrack vs Microsoft Dynamics SL comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Epicor Logo
195 views|70 comparisons
Microsoft Logo
204 views|156 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Epicor LumberTrack and Microsoft Dynamics SL based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Microsoft, Oracle and others in ERP.
To learn more, read our detailed ERP Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,065 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "If the value proposition is clear for the customer, they won't see it as an expensive solution. A solution becomes expensive when it doesn't do what it promises."
  • More Microsoft Dynamics SL Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.
    769,065 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:If I put myself in the customer's shoes, it's easier to use. Reporting would be a very valuable feature.
    Top Answer:An area of improvement could be around automation and predictability. However, I'm sure Microsoft is already thinking about incorporating AI co-pilot features, which should be coming soon. The end… more »
    Top Answer:Dynamics SL is used in oil and gas and discrete manufacturing. I've had no complaints, and it's fairly easy to use.
    Ranking
    45th
    out of 68 in ERP
    Views
    195
    Comparisons
    70
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    24th
    out of 68 in ERP
    Views
    204
    Comparisons
    156
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    930
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    LumberTrack
    Dynamics SL, MS Dynamics SL
    Learn More
    Overview

    Growth of our customers'​ business is at the heart of what we do. The strength of Epicor business solutions lies in a simplified approach to technology, inspired by our customers and how they work. More than 45 years of experience with our customers’ unique processes and operational requirements is built into every solution.

    We provide flexible, industry-specific software that is designed around the precise needs of our manufacturing, distribution, retail, and service industry customers.

    With a deep understanding of your industry, Epicor solutions promote growth while managing complexity. The result is powerful solutions that do exactly what you need—free your resources so you can profitably grow your business.

    Project management, job costing, materials management, service call entry, receiving, billing, and sales solution.
    Sample Customers
    Pacific Insight Electronics, Carr Sales Company, ETEL Limited
    ASAP, Espartec, S.A de C.V., TGLT, Calder‹n Autopartes El_ctricas, GGS Systems, CLEAResult, Shared Spectrum Company, Scope Global Pty Ltd
    Buyer's Guide
    ERP
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Microsoft, Oracle and others in ERP. Updated: April 2024.
    769,065 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Epicor LumberTrack is ranked 45th in ERP while Microsoft Dynamics SL is ranked 24th in ERP with 2 reviews. Epicor LumberTrack is rated 0.0, while Microsoft Dynamics SL is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Dynamics SL writes "Simplify and streamline complex business processes, and good integration capabilities but lacks predictive capabilities". Epicor LumberTrack is most compared with , whereas Microsoft Dynamics SL is most compared with .

    See our list of best ERP vendors.

    We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.