"The tool helps us understand network performance."
"When devices are having performance issues, it proactively build dashboards which allow us to go and do health checks, and resolve problems before they become an issue."
"The ability to quickly do drag and drop customized reports for dashboards."
"One feature I like about CA Performance Management is the certification of the devices."
"The feature that is inherent to its core, of being able to graphically represent a trend and status, is nice."
"There is another component of the tool called Network Flow Analysis. It gives us the ability to troubleshoot issues which do not appear right away."
"It gave us one location, one place to do all of group administration, and to build dashboards, and device administration, inventory counts... it really reduced our overall administrative overhead."
"The ability to very quickly and graphically navigate around, being able to zoom in to a timeframe, apply it to all the other panels... are all very intuitive."
"Scalable solution for tracking and syncing through the Infoblox grid."
"It needs role-based administration."
"This may be available by now but for server space, when it comes to the disk file system, I'd like to see that graphically represented, or the trend, rather than what I'm seeing now."
"CA PM can be complex to build and configure. Creating the folders / groups / sites required establishing many rule sets."
"It seems like we escalate more than I would like to. If anything, they should look at how the tier support goes in place."
"I think it would be helpful having a more comprehensive set of certifications so that I could natively deploy devices to my environment and the tool would immediately recognize and immediately be able to provide relevant performance information without a lot of tuning on my part."
"I have mixed feeling about the scalability. I feel like there are things which are being put into UIM right now that are not being included in Performance Center that we need to see in Performance Center. We are kind of being driven to buy UIM, and I can't justify it."
"This solution is not very scalable."
"Install is done as root, which is a security no-no, and the database IO requirements were not stated correctly, which lead to a year of instability."
"Lacks network overview for the entire connected network."
Earn 20 points
DX Performance Management is ranked 2nd in DX NetOps with 31 reviews while Infoblox NetMRI [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in DX NetOps. DX Performance Management is rated 8.2, while Infoblox NetMRI [EOL] is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of DX Performance Management writes "The vertical database loads faster than any other product available". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Infoblox NetMRI [EOL] writes "Has the ability to track and sync through the grid". DX Performance Management is most compared with DX Spectrum and OmniPeek, whereas Infoblox NetMRI [EOL] is most compared with .
We monitor all DX NetOps reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
