• Home
  • Coverity vs. Digital.ai App Aware [EOL]

Coverity vs Digital.ai App Aware [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Synopsys Logo

Coverity

Read 33 Coverity reviews
17,993 views|11,623 comparisons
88% willing to recommend
Digital.ai Logo

Digital.ai App Aware [EOL]

views| comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Application Security Testing (AST)
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Coverity and Digital.ai App Aware [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Testing (AST).
To learn more, read our detailed Application Security Testing (AST) Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
769,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Arun Dahiphale
Improves code quality and security and provides an informative dashboard and professional-looking reports
The solution has improved our code quality and security very well. It has multiple reports. I wanted good reports as evidence that we are doing... Read more →
Use Digital.ai App Aware [EOL]?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Coverity is quite expensive."
  • "The licensing fees are based on the number of lines of code."
  • "The price is competitive with other solutions."
  • "It is expensive."
  • "Coverity is very expensive."
  • "This is a pretty expensive solution. The overall value of the solution could be improved if the price was reduced. Licensing is done on an annual basis."
  • "The pricing is very reasonable compared to other platforms. It is based on a three year license."
  • "The pricing is on the expensive side, and we are paying for a couple of items."

    • More Coverity Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Testing (AST) solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    769,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    How would you decide between Coverity and Sonarqube?
    Top Answer:We researched Coverity, but in the end, we chose SonarQube. SonarQube is a tool for reviewing code quality and security. It helps to guide our development teams during code reviews by providing… more »
    What do you like most about Coverity?
    Top Answer:The solution has improved our code quality and security very well.
    Read all 23 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Coverity?
    Top Answer:The tool was fairly priced.
    Read all 20 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    4th
    out of 67 in Application Security Testing (AST)
    Views
    17,993
    Comparisons
    11,623
    Reviews
    22
    Average Words per Review
    382
    Rating
    8.0
    Unranked
    In Application Security Testing (AST)
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Synopsys Static Analysis
    Arxan App Aware
    Learn More
    Synopsys
    Digital.ai
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Coverity gives you the speed, ease of use, accuracy, industry standards compliance, and scalability that you need to develop high-quality, secure applications. Coverity identifies critical software quality defects and security vulnerabilities in code as it’s written, early in the development process, when it’s least costly and easiest to fix. With the Code Sight integrated development environment (IDE) plugin, developers get accurate analysis in seconds in their IDE as they code. Precise actionable remediation advice and context-specific eLearning help your developers understand how to fix their prioritized issues quickly, without having to become security experts. 

    Coverity seamlessly integrates automated security testing into your CI/CD pipelines and supports your existing development tools and workflows. Choose where and how to do your development: on-premises or in the cloud with the Polaris Software Integrity Platform (SaaS), a highly scalable, cloud-based application security platform. Coverity supports 22 languages and over 70 frameworks and templates.

    Intelligent threat detection and response capabilities are critical to stay ahead of an evolving threat landscape.

    Sample Customers
    MStar Semiconductor, Alcatel-Lucent
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company38%
    Computer Software Company21%
    Comms Service Provider17%
    Retailer8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company28%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Government4%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise69%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise76%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Security Testing (AST)
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Testing (AST). Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    769,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Coverity is ranked 4th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 33 reviews while Digital.ai App Aware [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Security Testing (AST). Coverity is rated 7.8, while Digital.ai App Aware [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Coverity writes "Best SAST tool to check software quality issues". On the other hand, Coverity is most compared with SonarQube, Klocwork, Fortify on Demand, Checkmarx One and Veracode, whereas Digital.ai App Aware [EOL] is most compared with .

    We monitor all Application Security Testing (AST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.