We performed a comparison between CoreMedia and Joomla based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Wordpress, Adobe and others in Web Content Management."CoreMedia is good for workflow management and user reviews."
"One of the most robust, stable, secure, feature-rich CMSs on the market."
"The speed in which you can take a CMS and make it a full-blown shopping cart with analytics tracking, SEO, user accounts, security, and ease of use through a robust framework of modules and plugins to enhance and promote-related content is about as turnkey as it gets with Joomla."
"It is difficult to scale the solution with respect to the costs and infrastructure."
"I would like to see more back-end admin power pulled into the front-end, therefore the admins will not have to use the back-end as much, especially for the menu manager, user manager, etc. versus using third-party extensions to achieve this."
"I would like to see the same sorting and attributes available through the web browser on the JED (sorting by free or commercial license, sort by rating, popularity, etc.) within the back-end Joomla Web Installer when browsing extensions."
CoreMedia is ranked 18th in Web Content Management with 1 review while Joomla is ranked 15th in Web Content Management. CoreMedia is rated 8.0, while Joomla is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of CoreMedia writes "Provides effective workflow management and catalog management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Joomla writes "One of the most robust, stable, secure, feature-rich CMSs on the market". CoreMedia is most compared with Magnolia CMS, Adobe Experience Manager and Sitecore Experience Manager, whereas Joomla is most compared with SharePoint.
See our list of best Web Content Management vendors.
We monitor all Web Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
