Comodo cWatch vs PT Application Firewall comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Xcitium Logo
338 views|244 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Positive Technologies Logo
130 views|109 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Comodo cWatch and PT Application Firewall based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF).
To learn more, read our detailed Web Application Firewall (WAF) Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,065 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Views
338
Comparisons
244
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
130
Comparisons
109
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: April 2024.
769,065 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
cWatch
Learn More
Positive Technologies
Video Not Available
Overview

Cwatch delivers robust website protection from hackers - while it helps you stay calm when online. It does not just stop with protection but helps in scanning the website to remove malware instantly. It is a complete website security tool that delivers state-of-the-art protection techniques to ensure SMB website security from simple to complex threat landscape. It ensures early threat detection, instant solution and sophisticated preventive measures.

The application security experts at Positive Technologies have spent over a decade analyzing thousands of unique network, Web, mobile, ERP and ICS/SCADA applications, discovering more than 150 zero-day vulnerabilities each year and securing the IT networks of leading banks, global telecommunications providers and industrial conglomerates. Positive Technologies is helping companies like yours meet their application security challenges head-on with:

  • Vulnerability Assessment (VA) and Security Configuration Assessment (SCA) for OS, DB, Web-server, Frameworks and ERP in white and black box modes
  • SAST, DAST and IAST analysis of deployed applications and source code
  • PT Application Firewall protection of Web and mobile applications and ERP systems
  • Deep inspection of client-server, Web, ERP and mobile applications and embedded systems
  • Secure Software Development Lifecycle (SSDL) consulting
Sample Customers
Xerox, Intel, HP, UPS, Western Union, Western Digital
Sberbank NPF, Svyaznoy, MegaFon, Ural Federal University, VGTRK
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company14%
Comms Service Provider14%
Wholesaler/Distributor12%
Manufacturing Company11%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business36%
Midsize Enterprise27%
Large Enterprise36%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: April 2024.
769,065 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comodo cWatch is ranked 35th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) while PT Application Firewall is ranked 44th in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Comodo cWatch is rated 9.6, while PT Application Firewall is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Comodo cWatch writes "Excellent security, good encryption, and pretty stable". On the other hand, Comodo cWatch is most compared with Cloudflare, Atomic ModSecurity Rules, Sucuri and AWS WAF, whereas PT Application Firewall is most compared with .

See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.