We performed a comparison between Cisco Container Platform and Google Container Engine based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Amazon Web Services (AWS), VMware and others in Container Management."The most valuable feature is definitely the fact that you can use a single platform to deploy to different resource providers. Right now, the version I'm using has vSphere and AWS, but I know in the future they're planning on adding more. The ability to deploy clusters on-prem or to any number of public cloud providers is really valuable because you don't need to relearn or switch platforms to switch resource providers."
"The tool is very powerful, scalable, and easy to manage. Its autoscaling features helped us save costs."
"One thing that is a little bit annoying about Cisco Container Platform is that for each cluster you create you have to go through the same web form each time. If you're creating two identical clusters, you still have to go through that web form twice."
"Google Container Engine needs to be able to manage network products."
Earn 20 points
Cisco Container Platform is ranked 20th in Container Management while Google Container Engine is ranked 14th in Container Management with 1 review. Cisco Container Platform is rated 8.0, while Google Container Engine is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Container Platform writes "Enables the deployment/management of Kubernetes clusters from multiple resource providers at one location". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Google Container Engine writes "Has autoscaling features that helps to save costs ". Cisco Container Platform is most compared with Kubernetes, OpenShift Container Platform and VMware Tanzu Mission Control, whereas Google Container Engine is most compared with .
See our list of best Container Management vendors.
We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.