We performed a comparison between Check Point Capsule Software [EOL] and Jamf Connect based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Sophos, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Mobile Data Protection."The antivirus is great since it helps us with the real-time protection of all devices."
"We're taking advantage of the computing power that the cloud has made."
"It is very simple to install and use."
"Check Point Capsule can use SSO so that we can use a single identity for all our users and tasks in the organization."
"The most valuable feature is ease of access. It's convenient to do things like resetting passwords. Previously, users were bound to their domain. We had to bind the user to the domain and log them in through the AD. Now, using Jamf Connect, we don't face any of these challenges. Resetting passwords is hassle-free so we can regularly rotate passwords according to best practices."
"The solution is scalable."
"It's connection with Azure is the most valuable. It is easy to deploy and connect."
"Jamf Connect is an identity provider, and once you log in, you will have all the device's access."
"It's a good and stable tool, so you should use it if you have a need."
"Jamf Connect is a pretty simple and straightforward tool overall."
"I would rate the product's scalability an eight out of ten."
"Jamf Connect allows for easy and seamless joining of Mac devices to Azure AD, eliminating the need for third-party involvement or support engineer assistance."
"Check Point has already been making several changes to Check Point Capsule and has transformed it into Check Point Harmony."
"Among the features that I would have liked to see in its beginnings and in use of the solution is the ability to integrate real-time analysis and emulation of the activities that a user has when being attacked."
"There should be more clarity when it comes to licensing because it is difficult to understand."
"Cloud security could add more advanced features for apps and services."
"The configuration could be faster."
"Overall, there is a lack of consistent experience sometimes with some of their features."
"The solution's UI could be more user-friendly for the setup process."
"Jamf Connect is beginning to implement Multi-Factor Authentication for offline authentication, but the setup documentation is insufficient."
"When a Mac is joined to Azure, the generic Pro console in the MDM should accurately display the Mac as joined to Azure in the inventory section. Currently, it shows "no domain account found," which can be misleading."
"We have faced issues with the product's configuration. If we use the tool with other business manager solutions, then there is the issue of naming conventions. The tool needs to be careful with newer updates so that it doesn't break any of the existing configurations."
"The solution’s technical support is bad and should be improved."
"The solution needs to improve its licensing."
More Check Point Capsule Software [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Check Point Capsule Software [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Mobile Data Protection with 4 reviews while Jamf Connect is ranked 8th in ZTNA as a Service with 10 reviews. Check Point Capsule Software [EOL] is rated 8.6, while Jamf Connect is rated 9.4. The top reviewer of Check Point Capsule Software [EOL] writes "Secure, great value, and compatible with iOS and Android". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Jamf Connect writes "Enhances user convenience by streamlining login processes". Check Point Capsule Software [EOL] is most compared with Microsoft BitLocker, whereas Jamf Connect is most compared with Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, VMware Workspace ONE, Netskope Private Access and Zimperium.
We monitor all Mobile Data Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
