We performed a comparison between AWS Control Tower and Jamcracker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Nutanix, IBM and others in Cloud Management."Compliance is the most valuable feature."
"One of the standout advantages is the fine-grained control it offers in terms of permissions and privileges."
"AWS Control Tower helps companies save costs."
"It is incredibly user-friendly and functions seamlessly."
"It aligns well with the customer's needs and it ultimately fosters a strong customer-company relationship."
"It provides centralized solutions for all AWS accounts in one place, customized to meet the organization's specific needs."
"The most intriguing feature is the automatic generation of user accounts. Leveraging Active Directory and global company settings, AWS Cloud Tower enables the creation of AWS user accounts based on job descriptions in Active Directory. This establishes a direct correlation between the user's name, job definition, and the corresponding rules applied to each account."
"The most significant benefit of Control Tower is its capability to align with our organization's standards."
"The solution allows us to manage multiple cloud resources from one place."
"The initial setup is complex."
"By making APIs and organizational units more centralized, it would be simpler to pinpoint the source of issues in case of a breach and would ultimately benefit everyone involved."
"The sole drawback is its restriction to enable only one Control Tower."
"It could be improved by having a more intuitive graphical interface. It could also include other coding languages like PowerShell and Python, as it would be beneficial for DevOps recommendations."
"The product's affordability depends on the value it brings to specific organizations."
"There aren't any additional features that I feel are missing. However, it's worth noting that Control Tower seems to function as a layer utilizing standard AWS products in the background. Occasionally, the interface may appear less streamlined, with changes in layout based on the underlying products being used. While this doesn't impact functionality, having a more standardized user interface, irrespective of the background products, could enhance the user experience."
"There should be more automation security tools in the Control Tower."
"While using the solution recently, it broke a certain activity. So, AWS Control Tower needs to consider making the solution better."
"The product must improve its stability and speed."
AWS Control Tower is ranked 11th in Cloud Management with 15 reviews while Jamcracker is ranked 33rd in Cloud Management with 1 review. AWS Control Tower is rated 8.2, while Jamcracker is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AWS Control Tower writes "A robust protection for efficient cloud governance and security". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Jamcracker writes "A scalable and easy-to-deploy solution that allows users to manage multiple cloud resources". AWS Control Tower is most compared with AWS Trusted Advisor, Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control, VMware Aria Automation and Morpheus, whereas Jamcracker is most compared with IBM Cloud Brokerage.
See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
