AWS Control Tower vs HPE Eucalyptus comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
1,087 views|730 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Logo
388 views|177 comparisons
50% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AWS Control Tower and HPE Eucalyptus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Cloud Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed AWS Control Tower vs. HPE Eucalyptus Report (Updated: May 2024).
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most intriguing feature is the automatic generation of user accounts. Leveraging Active Directory and global company settings, AWS Cloud Tower enables the creation of AWS user accounts based on job descriptions in Active Directory. This establishes a direct correlation between the user's name, job definition, and the corresponding rules applied to each account.""There are two features in Control Tower which are the most valuable. One is the guardrails because it has preventive and detective guardrails.""One of the standout advantages is the fine-grained control it offers in terms of permissions and privileges.""Compliance is the most valuable feature.""It provides centralized solutions for all AWS accounts in one place, customized to meet the organization's specific needs.""The solution's initial setup was easy for me.""AWS Control Tower helps companies save costs.""It offers automated recommendations for security and policies, creating a landing zone and providing a list of policies."

More AWS Control Tower Pros →

"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the interface on the console."

More HPE Eucalyptus Pros →

Cons
"It could be improved by having a more intuitive graphical interface. It could also include other coding languages like PowerShell and Python, as it would be beneficial for DevOps recommendations.""There aren't any additional features that I feel are missing. However, it's worth noting that Control Tower seems to function as a layer utilizing standard AWS products in the background. Occasionally, the interface may appear less streamlined, with changes in layout based on the underlying products being used. While this doesn't impact functionality, having a more standardized user interface, irrespective of the background products, could enhance the user experience.""The integration with other AWS functions has room for improvement.""The initial setup is complex.""By making APIs and organizational units more centralized, it would be simpler to pinpoint the source of issues in case of a breach and would ultimately benefit everyone involved.""There should be more automation security tools in the Control Tower.""The sole drawback is its restriction to enable only one Control Tower.""The tool's setup is very technical. Its pricing can be cheaper."

More AWS Control Tower Cons →

"The customization should be improved."

More HPE Eucalyptus Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The solution is free."
  • "On a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price and ten is a high price, I rate the pricing an eight."
  • "The product's affordability depends on the value it brings to specific organizations."
  • "It is expensive but it is an investment in my opinion."
  • "AWS Control Tower is not really that expensive."
  • "The pricing is efficient, not overly expensive but also not very cheap."
  • "The cost is reasonable, but there are opportunities for improvement in terms of pricing for larger enterprises."
  • "It operates on a pay-as-you-go model, meaning we are charged only for the services we actively use within it."
  • More AWS Control Tower Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.
    770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most intriguing feature is the automatic generation of user accounts. Leveraging Active Directory and global company settings, AWS Cloud Tower enables the creation of AWS user accounts based on… more »
    Top Answer:I believe it's free of charge or comes at a very low cost. It's an additional feature. Even if there is a fee, it's minimal. AWS seems to assist customers in gaining a comprehensive view of their… more »
    Top Answer:There aren't any additional features that I feel are missing. However, it's worth noting that Control Tower seems to function as a layer utilizing standard AWS products in the background… more »
    Top Answer:The best cloud platform for your organization will depend on specific needs and requirements, but below are the advantages and disadvantages of VMware vSphere, Rackspace OpenStack, and HPE Eucalyptus… more »
    Ranking
    11th
    out of 75 in Cloud Management
    Views
    1,087
    Comparisons
    730
    Reviews
    15
    Average Words per Review
    586
    Rating
    8.3
    38th
    out of 75 in Cloud Management
    Views
    388
    Comparisons
    177
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Eucalyptus, HP Eucalyptus
    Learn More
    Overview

    AWS Control Tower offers the easiest way to set up and govern a new, secure, multi-account AWS environment. It establishes a landing zone that is based on best-practices blueprints, and enables governance using guardrails you can choose from a pre-packaged list.

    HP Eucalyptus helps customers grow revenue and stay ahead of competition by enabling developers to get the IT resources they need in seconds, not days. Its unique AWS compatibility ensures applications are easily deployed in private, public or hybrid cloud environments.
    Sample Customers
    Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
    Mosaik Solutions, Nava Solutions
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Educational Organization9%
    Government8%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business60%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise27%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise64%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    AWS Control Tower vs. HPE Eucalyptus
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Control Tower vs. HPE Eucalyptus and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    AWS Control Tower is ranked 11th in Cloud Management with 15 reviews while HPE Eucalyptus is ranked 38th in Cloud Management. AWS Control Tower is rated 8.2, while HPE Eucalyptus is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of AWS Control Tower writes "A robust protection for efficient cloud governance and security". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE Eucalyptus writes "Good interface, and an easy initial setup with good community support on the free version". AWS Control Tower is most compared with AWS Trusted Advisor, Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control, VMware Aria Automation and Morpheus, whereas HPE Eucalyptus is most compared with OpenNebula. See our AWS Control Tower vs. HPE Eucalyptus report.

    See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

    We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.