We performed a comparison between AWS Control Tower and HPE Eucalyptus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most intriguing feature is the automatic generation of user accounts. Leveraging Active Directory and global company settings, AWS Cloud Tower enables the creation of AWS user accounts based on job descriptions in Active Directory. This establishes a direct correlation between the user's name, job definition, and the corresponding rules applied to each account."
"There are two features in Control Tower which are the most valuable. One is the guardrails because it has preventive and detective guardrails."
"One of the standout advantages is the fine-grained control it offers in terms of permissions and privileges."
"Compliance is the most valuable feature."
"It provides centralized solutions for all AWS accounts in one place, customized to meet the organization's specific needs."
"The solution's initial setup was easy for me."
"AWS Control Tower helps companies save costs."
"It offers automated recommendations for security and policies, creating a landing zone and providing a list of policies."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the interface on the console."
"It could be improved by having a more intuitive graphical interface. It could also include other coding languages like PowerShell and Python, as it would be beneficial for DevOps recommendations."
"There aren't any additional features that I feel are missing. However, it's worth noting that Control Tower seems to function as a layer utilizing standard AWS products in the background. Occasionally, the interface may appear less streamlined, with changes in layout based on the underlying products being used. While this doesn't impact functionality, having a more standardized user interface, irrespective of the background products, could enhance the user experience."
"The integration with other AWS functions has room for improvement."
"The initial setup is complex."
"By making APIs and organizational units more centralized, it would be simpler to pinpoint the source of issues in case of a breach and would ultimately benefit everyone involved."
"There should be more automation security tools in the Control Tower."
"The sole drawback is its restriction to enable only one Control Tower."
"The tool's setup is very technical. Its pricing can be cheaper."
"The customization should be improved."
AWS Control Tower is ranked 11th in Cloud Management with 15 reviews while HPE Eucalyptus is ranked 38th in Cloud Management. AWS Control Tower is rated 8.2, while HPE Eucalyptus is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of AWS Control Tower writes "A robust protection for efficient cloud governance and security". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE Eucalyptus writes "Good interface, and an easy initial setup with good community support on the free version". AWS Control Tower is most compared with AWS Trusted Advisor, Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control, VMware Aria Automation and Morpheus, whereas HPE Eucalyptus is most compared with OpenNebula. See our AWS Control Tower vs. HPE Eucalyptus report.
See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.