We performed a comparison between AWS Control Tower and Cisco Piston Enterprise OS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Nutanix, IBM and others in Cloud Management."Compliance is the most valuable feature."
"It is incredibly user-friendly and functions seamlessly."
"One of the standout advantages is the fine-grained control it offers in terms of permissions and privileges."
"The most intriguing feature is the automatic generation of user accounts. Leveraging Active Directory and global company settings, AWS Cloud Tower enables the creation of AWS user accounts based on job descriptions in Active Directory. This establishes a direct correlation between the user's name, job definition, and the corresponding rules applied to each account."
"With Control Tower, there are ready-to-use automated templates available, simplifying the implementation of a centralized management solution."
"AWS Control Tower helps to save a lot of work and manage multiple accounts."
"The solution's initial setup was easy for me."
"The most significant benefit of Control Tower is its capability to align with our organization's standards."
"It offers enough support so that you don't need to have the need to get another device."
"AWS Control Tower should improve its fast execution. It also needs more tools for triggering and monitoring AWS services. AWS Control Tower needs more tracking as well."
"The solution's stability could be improved."
"While using the solution recently, it broke a certain activity. So, AWS Control Tower needs to consider making the solution better."
"The integration with other AWS functions has room for improvement."
"By making APIs and organizational units more centralized, it would be simpler to pinpoint the source of issues in case of a breach and would ultimately benefit everyone involved."
"It could be improved by having a more intuitive graphical interface. It could also include other coding languages like PowerShell and Python, as it would be beneficial for DevOps recommendations."
"The sole drawback is its restriction to enable only one Control Tower."
"It is essential to clarify that this isn't necessarily a drawback of the service, but having a clear and concise set of predefined guidelines from AWS for moving existing accounts under AWS Control Tower would be highly beneficial as it would simplify the process and make it more user-friendly."
"The solution is just too expensive, so maybe the pricing could be better."
Earn 20 points
AWS Control Tower is ranked 11th in Cloud Management with 15 reviews while Cisco Piston Enterprise OS is ranked 51st in Cloud Management. AWS Control Tower is rated 8.2, while Cisco Piston Enterprise OS is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of AWS Control Tower writes "A robust protection for efficient cloud governance and security". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco Piston Enterprise OS writes "A simple interface and helpful support for a solution that grows with us". AWS Control Tower is most compared with AWS Trusted Advisor, Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control, VMware Aria Automation and Morpheus, whereas Cisco Piston Enterprise OS is most compared with Abiquo.
See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
