Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z vs DBmaestro Database Release and Automation comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z and DBmaestro Database Release and Automation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Release Automation Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,065 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
32nd
out of 32 in Release Automation
Views
22
Comparisons
12
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
25th
out of 32 in Release Automation
Views
60
Comparisons
47
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Release Automation
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation. Updated: April 2024.
769,065 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
Broadcom
Video Not Available
Overview

Modernize your legacy systems.
We live in the online world. The way of business and technology seems to be all mobile and cloud these days. Nevertheless, mainframes remain paramount and integral to core business transactions worldwide and are here to stay.

At CA Technologies we feel that continuous delivery for the mainframe holds the key to digital transformation with minimal disruption. The mainframe needs to be connected to your continuous delivery pipelines and DevOps practices in order to be completely agile and responsive to business demands.

At present most mainframe users face significant challenges that hinder agility:

Driven by manual interactions–ISPF panels initiate CLIST scripts
Collaboration of multiple Dev and Ops teams involving lots of processes and procedures
Applications written many years ago in COBOL and other legacy languages
Treating the mix of mainframe and distributed apps found in most services differently with dedicated change processes and toolsets
Mitigating risk and ensure compliance in a highly regulated environment
Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z connects digital and mainframe applications, automates them and incorporates them in an automated workflow.

Publish releases quickly, prevent accidental overrides, and reduce application downtime caused by database-related errors, all while maintaining stability, scalability, and security.

Sample Customers
eviivo
Anthem, ING Bank Turkey, Isracard, Clalbit Systems, Israel Ministry of Education
Buyer's Guide
Release Automation
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation. Updated: April 2024.
769,065 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z is ranked 32nd in Release Automation while DBmaestro Database Release and Automation is ranked 25th in Release Automation. Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z is rated 0.0, while DBmaestro Database Release and Automation is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z is most compared with , whereas DBmaestro Database Release and Automation is most compared with .

See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.