We performed a comparison between ArcSight Analytics and Microsoft ATA [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Splunk, Rapid7 and others in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)."The data collection and the integration with different products are valuable features."
"The most valuable feature is the log monitoring."
"ArcSight Analytics is used to get a deeper insight and threat analysis about the network."
"The ability to correlate different logs is the solution's most valuable feature."
"The solution is easy to implement."
"One of the most valuable features is the alerts."
"Less resource consumption in terms of memory and processing."
"The features I have found most valuable are it capabilities for behavioral analytics and anomaly detection."
"One of the most valuable features is the ability to report on questionable activity."
"The solution works well when used with other Microsoft solutions."
"The stability of the solution is very good."
"[There is] complexity in maintaining it and managing it. It's not easy to use. It requires a lot of training."
"It needs more user analytics and aggregation user queries. And it's slow. When you query over ArcSight, it is very slow."
"There is a GUI, but it is not complete and lacks functionality that needs to be performed using the console."
"The customer service could be improved, and additional integrations with other APIs could be added."
"Their support team could be better."
"ArcSight is not a user-friendly solution and the interface needs to be improved."
"The GUI interface is not always intuitive and easy for non-technical users to work with."
"The reporting and the way it is worded needs to be improved in future releases. The dashboards are quite poorly designed."
"It would be ideal if the interface allowed for more granular configurations. For example, if I were to set a rule that is a deviation from the pre-defined rules in the Microsoft product, there's conflict."
"There are occasions where it generates some false positives and you have to embark into figuring it out. You need to find out if it was a true alert or a false positive. It's a little bit cumbersome in that area."
"Some of the newer features are not completely there yet... For example, there's a tool that allows you to grade your overall internal security and I don't feel that it's completely accurate."
Earn 20 points
ArcSight Analytics is ranked 16th in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) with 15 reviews while Microsoft ATA [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA). ArcSight Analytics is rated 7.0, while Microsoft ATA [EOL] is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of ArcSight Analytics writes "It has improved our system and network policy monitoring". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft ATA [EOL] writes "Easy to define rules but interface needs better granularity and only integrates well with other Microsoft solutions". ArcSight Analytics is most compared with Securonix UEBA, whereas Microsoft ATA [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) vendors.
We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
