We performed a comparison between Amazon Redshift and Teradata IntelliFlex based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Warehouse solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The feature that we find most useful is the ability to do analytics on the fly."
"The initial setup is easy."
"We have found Machine Learning use cases are very nice."
"The processing of data is very fast."
"The stability of Amazon Redshift is good."
"I like it because the usage is very similar to Microsoft SQL server. The structure of the query and the temporary tables are very similar."
"The solution's flexibility is its most valuable feature. It's also easy to scale and has relatively painless pricing."
"Has a very user-friendly SQL editor and it's very easy to use the connectors."
"The product's scalability is great. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"Intelliflex is very scalable. In fact, scalability has improved 100 times by Intelliflex, in my personal opinion."
"It is very stable. It's 100% uptime. Speed and resilience are one of the greatest features of this product. In almost twenty years we've never had downtime, except for outages for patches and upgrades. We've never had a system failure in twenty years."
"IntelliFlex is easy to scale - one of its best features is that you can upscale it to the size you want."
"The solution's banking model, called FSLDM (Financial Services Logical Data Model), is sophisticated and good."
"In the solution, user-based access is quite hard. In general, certain permissions are difficult to manage."
"Amazon Redshift is a little more expensive than other products."
"The explain panel in the Redshift database could be better."
"Running parallel queries results in poor performance and this needs to be improved."
"Query compilation time needs a lot of improvement for cases where you are generating queries dynamically."
"If you require a highly scalable solution, I would not recommend Amazon Redshift."
"They should provide a better way to work with interim data in a structured way than to store it in parquet files locally."
"Compatibility with other products, for example, Microsoft and Google, is a bit difficult because each one of them wants to be isolated with their solutions."
"The reporting side wasn't very good in the past, but with the latest versions, it's getting better. Still, the friendliness of the PDC reporting and functionality needs to be improved."
"The only issue our company has with Teradata IntelliFlex is that it is not cost-effective because of the way the product has been designed."
"They should add more connectors to different platforms."
"The initial setup is complex because there are a lot of factors that come into play, including the amount of software and applications that require access."
"The solution’s pricing, scalability, and technical support response time could be improved."
Amazon Redshift is ranked 4th in Cloud Data Warehouse with 59 reviews while Teradata IntelliFlex is ranked 11th in Data Warehouse with 5 reviews. Amazon Redshift is rated 7.8, while Teradata IntelliFlex is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Amazon Redshift writes "Provides one place where we can store data, and allows us to easily connect to other services with AWS". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Teradata IntelliFlex writes "A tool that provides high performance and speed to its users, along with an exceptional scalability option". Amazon Redshift is most compared with Teradata, Snowflake, AWS Lake Formation, Vertica and Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics, whereas Teradata IntelliFlex is most compared with Teradata and Oracle Exadata. See our Amazon Redshift vs. Teradata IntelliFlex report.
See our list of best Data Warehouse vendors.
We monitor all Data Warehouse reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
