We performed a comparison between ActiveBatch by Redwood and WS_FTP Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT).Earn 20 points
ActiveBatch by Redwood is ranked 5th in Managed File Transfer (MFT) with 35 reviews while WS_FTP Server is ranked 22nd in Managed File Transfer (MFT). ActiveBatch by Redwood is rated 9.2, while WS_FTP Server is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of ActiveBatch by Redwood writes "Flexible, easy to use, and offers good automation". On the other hand, ActiveBatch by Redwood is most compared with Control-M, AutoSys Workload Automation, Tidal by Redwood, VisualCron and IBM Workload Automation, whereas WS_FTP Server is most compared with MOVEit, IBM Sterling File Gateway, Fortra's Globalscape Managed File Transfer, CompleteFTP and SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server.
See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors.
We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.