ACL Analytics vs Enablon comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Galvanize Logo
2,900 views|886 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Wolters Kluwer Logo
255 views|173 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between ACL Analytics and Enablon based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC.
To learn more, read our detailed GRC Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,662 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing for me as an individual seems a lot. For our organization, the price is okay. It's about $6,000 a year. I don't know of any additional costs."
  • More ACL Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which GRC solutions are best for your needs.
    769,662 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The tool's most valuable feature is its ability to import files from other software packages. Its reporting and visualization capabilities have made our reporting easier. Importing results into… more »
    Top Answer:The licensing cost for ACL Analytics is around $6,000, which includes both SCA and hybrid functionalities. There are no extra fees.
    Top Answer:The product's pricing has increased over the years.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    6th
    out of 86 in GRC
    Views
    2,900
    Comparisons
    886
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    350
    Rating
    9.3
    31st
    out of 86 in GRC
    Views
    255
    Comparisons
    173
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Enablon GRC Suite
    Learn More
    Overview
    ACL Analytics connects you to any data source, and lets you run sophisticated risk analytics and detect anomalies or patterns that you simply can't illuminate with any amount of random sampling, spreadsheet ninjutsu or generic business intelligence. It's designed for you, the GRC professional.

    Enablon GRC solutions provide a consistent and all-encompassing approach to corporate governance, enterprise risk management, and compliance.

    Sample Customers
    Essar Group, Dean Foods, Lafarge North America, Austrian Ministry of Finance
    Danone
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government15%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Computer Software Company8%
    University8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Energy/Utilities Company16%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Government10%
    Retailer8%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise64%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise76%
    Buyer's Guide
    GRC
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC. Updated: April 2024.
    769,662 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    ACL Analytics is ranked 6th in GRC with 5 reviews while Enablon is ranked 31st in GRC. ACL Analytics is rated 9.4, while Enablon is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of ACL Analytics writes "Helps to find matches and also the situations where certain cell points match, but there's a difference between two different records". On the other hand, ACL Analytics is most compared with Galvanize HighBond, SAS Enterprise GRC, RSA Archer, Workiva Wdesk and MEGA HOPEX, whereas Enablon is most compared with RSA Archer.

    See our list of best GRC vendors.

    We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.