Share your experience using Ubisecure Identity Platform

I use Teleport to replace the normal authentication mechanism as part of a zero-trust architecture. It is particularly useful because, in a remote environment, I cannot trust any devices. I can share access remotely with anyone via a browser for more secure tracking of data.

Teleport has replaced earlier methods like a bastion server or a jump server, which required connecting to physical servers. It integrates well with single sign-on (SSO) and Ansible Playbooks, allowing me to manage inventories easily. 

Teleport provides a straightforward setup process with a single command line, making it easier to manage the onboarding and offboarding of team members.

I cannot download or share session recordings directly with others, which would be useful for documentation or reviews. 

Additionally, while the backend worker can be upgraded, there is a limitation with scaling, as it supports only a single node even in Kubernetes.

I have been using Teleport for two years.

Initially, there were stability issues when integrating with single sign-on and storing sessions. After resolving them, Teleport has been stable.

Teleport supports only a single node in the Kubernetes environment, which limits its scalability. It is straightforward for single standalone components, however, the UI component cannot be upgraded directly.

Previously, I used a jump server and accessed systems with an SSH key and a normal VM login. 

I switched to Teleport since colleagues and friends recommended it, highlighting its enterprise-level capabilities.

The initial setup was straightforward due to my expertise in Linux, particularly Red Hat and Ubuntu operating systems. I found the setup to be very easy.

With Teleport, my time spent on onboarding and offboarding has reduced significantly. I no longer need to manually manage access, which saves time and effort.

Another option I considered was HashiCorp's Boundary, however, it had a complex setup that was difficult for beginners. Teleport's straightforward setup was more appealing.

I rate Teleport nine out of ten. 

Security-wise, it is very secure and easy to use for remote access. I recommend it for its straightforward setup and strong security features.

Clients may use Microsoft Entra ID Governance for various identity management tasks.

The features of this product stand out as the best, which make the solution effective.

Analytics can be useful for web applications and financial solutions.

Microsoft integration is quite good.

I utilize reporting and auditing capabilities, which are particularly useful.

In terms of integration, improvements could be made.

To enhance integration, they could provide out-of-box integration with HashiCorp. This out-of-box integration with HashiCorp or another product would be beneficial, as that's still evolving.

Integrations with out-of-the-box applications remain an area for improvement.

I have been using it for one and a half years.

For scalability, I would rate it nine out of ten.

I rate technical support seven out of ten.

They don't have many resources, which is why I give it seven.

Positive

The installation process is easy and straightforward.

The pricing is good, and I think the solution is affordable.

I don't have experience working with SAP, SalePoint, or any other similar solutions.

I am currently working in the field of identity management and work with Microsoft Entra ID Governance as a consultant.

I am not a reseller or distributor.

The features of this product are excellent, though it's not as good as the market leaders.

The solution has excellent stability, which I would rate as nine out of ten.

Overall, I would rate the solution eight out of ten.