Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Share your experience using Ubisecure Identity Platform

The easiest route - we'll conduct a 15 minute phone interview and write up the review for you.

Use our online form to submit your review. It's quick and you can post anonymously.

Your review helps others learn about this solution
The PeerSpot community is built upon trust and sharing with peers.
It's good for your career
In today's digital world, your review shows you have valuable expertise.
You can influence the market
Vendors read their reviews and make improvements based on your feedback.
Examples of the 94,000+ reviews on PeerSpot:

Jyothikumar C - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Engineering Manager at Ninjacart
Real User
Top 5
Streamlined access management through integration and simplified setup
Pros and Cons
  • "Teleport has replaced earlier methods like a bastion server or a jump server, which required connecting to physical servers."
  • "I recommend it for its straightforward setup and strong security features."
  • "I cannot download or share session recordings directly with others, which would be useful for documentation or reviews."
  • "I cannot download or share session recordings directly with others, which would be useful for documentation or reviews."

What is our primary use case?

I use Teleport to replace the normal authentication mechanism as part of a zero-trust architecture. It is particularly useful because, in a remote environment, I cannot trust any devices. I can share access remotely with anyone via a browser for more secure tracking of data.

What is most valuable?

Teleport has replaced earlier methods like a bastion server or a jump server, which required connecting to physical servers. It integrates well with single sign-on (SSO) and Ansible Playbooks, allowing me to manage inventories easily. 

Teleport provides a straightforward setup process with a single command line, making it easier to manage the onboarding and offboarding of team members.

What needs improvement?

I cannot download or share session recordings directly with others, which would be useful for documentation or reviews. 

Additionally, while the backend worker can be upgraded, there is a limitation with scaling, as it supports only a single node even in Kubernetes.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Teleport for two years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Initially, there were stability issues when integrating with single sign-on and storing sessions. After resolving them, Teleport has been stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Teleport supports only a single node in the Kubernetes environment, which limits its scalability. It is straightforward for single standalone components, however, the UI component cannot be upgraded directly.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Previously, I used a jump server and accessed systems with an SSH key and a normal VM login. 

I switched to Teleport since colleagues and friends recommended it, highlighting its enterprise-level capabilities.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was straightforward due to my expertise in Linux, particularly Red Hat and Ubuntu operating systems. I found the setup to be very easy.

What was our ROI?

With Teleport, my time spent on onboarding and offboarding has reduced significantly. I no longer need to manually manage access, which saves time and effort.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Another option I considered was HashiCorp's Boundary, however, it had a complex setup that was difficult for beginners. Teleport's straightforward setup was more appealing.

What other advice do I have?

I rate Teleport nine out of ten. 

Security-wise, it is very secure and easy to use for remote access. I recommend it for its straightforward setup and strong security features.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Other
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Flag as inappropriate
reviewer2703900 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Cybersecurity Engineer
Real User
User-friendly interface makes device management and auditing easy
Pros and Cons
  • "Microsoft Entra ID is pretty user-friendly and intuitive. The graphics are particularly useful when it comes to the auditing part."
  • "I saw the benefits of Microsoft Entra ID immediately after I started using it."
  • "I would appreciate it if they linked the Microsoft Entra ID platform with other 365 platforms, such as the governance of Power BI or the security for the App Center. That would be very useful since we have many platforms related to Microsoft 365. We need to have a link or different profiles for managing through Microsoft Entra ID, which is the main platform."
  • "The quality of support is regular. If you contact Microsoft support directly for Microsoft Entra ID, it's faster, but when you do it through a partner, it takes more time."

What is our primary use case?

I use Microsoft Entra ID to manage the identities of production and creating groups, as well as to enable multi-factor authentication for users. Other use cases include looking at devices that are linked to users.

What is most valuable?

Microsoft Entra ID is pretty user-friendly and intuitive. The graphics are particularly useful when it comes to the auditing part. I saw the benefits of Microsoft Entra ID immediately after I started using it.

What needs improvement?

I would appreciate it if they linked the Microsoft Entra ID platform with other 365 platforms, such as the governance of Power BI or the security for the App Center. That would be very useful since we have many platforms related to Microsoft 365. We need to have a link or different profiles for managing through Microsoft Entra ID, which is the main platform.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Microsoft Entra ID for four years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I would rate the stability of Microsoft Entra ID a nine out of ten.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I would rate the scalability for Microsoft Entra ID an eight out of ten.

How are customer service and support?

I have contacted technical support for Microsoft Entra ID. The quality of support is regular. If you contact Microsoft support directly for Microsoft Entra ID, it's faster, but when you do it through a partner, it takes more time.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Neutral

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I have not used any alternatives to Microsoft Entra ID in my career.

How was the initial setup?

I wasn't in the company when Microsoft Entra ID was deployed. I started when it was already deployed. I know that the deployment of Microsoft Entra ID is pretty easy because we can do it with AD Connect.

It took me two weeks to learn how to use it. I would rate it a six out of ten in terms of the learning curve.

Its maintenance is taken care of by Microsoft. 

What other advice do I have?

My advice for new users on how to start with Microsoft Entra ID is to take the Azure fundamentals certification AC-900, which gives you much insight, as well as the AC-500 for identity. 

I would rate Microsoft Entra ID as eight out of ten.

Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
Flag as inappropriate