Mirantis Container Cloud Reviews

I use the solution in my company since we have some in-house applications, and to spin up those applications, we use Docker Enterprise.

The most valuable features of the solution are its fairly good UI design and its ability to let users view logs.

Though I am unsure, I feel that the product lacks to offer a proper health status of the images which are running, making it an area where improvements are required.

I have been using Mirantis Container Cloud for six months. I work with the tool's desktop version. I am just a user of the tool.

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

Around 20 people in my company use the product.

The solution offers a good online community that offers users the option to ask questions related to the product and get answers to troubleshoot the issues.

The product's initial setup phase is simple.

The solution is deployed on an on-premises model.

I rate the product price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one means low price and ten means high price.

Maybe the other people in my company's environment might be using Doctor Enterprise to manage multi-cloud Kubernetes environments, but I don't use it for that.

The product optimizes and makes DevOps workflow better since it spins up images very fast, and it is a good thing that I have seen in the tool. It is easy to manage which Docker needs to be run and which one needs to be stopped, and it is an area where I use the product the most.

I don't use the tool's centralized management console. I use it individually.

I use the single dashboard option provided by the tool, and if I need to be helpful.

I recommend the product to those who plan to use it.

I rate the tool a ten out of ten.

This solution has cut down on our development time and allows us to spin off new instances for inner development, testing, productions, and security testing.

Areas for improvement are the privacy of container management and the documentation. In the next release, I would like to see best practices on how to manage distributed containers and networks.

I've been using this solution for about five years.

This solution is pretty much stable.

This solution is extremely scalable - we are able to spin off multiple instances very rapidly.

Initial setup was extremely simple and was done in minutes.

I implemented through an in-house team.

I would rate this solution as eight out of ten.

We are a solution provider and we sell products to our customers. Our webpage has solutions from Microsoft and HPE. Mirantis Container Cloud is one of the products that we offer.

We have only just begun our research here in Venezuela. We are studying this technology.

It has promised to solve several issues here in Venezuela if we can encapsulate the legacy applications using it.

If we compare legacy application support to Docker, it's a superior product. 

This product will only be useful if it can successfully run legacy applications in the cloud.

Docker is a free solution.

I would rate this solution a ten out of ten.

What I like most about Docker is that it is straightforward and easy to use, yet powerful. The graphical interface is very user-friendly and reporting is fast and effective.

Sometimes it is difficult to access the quality of information on Docker. I also feel that it is not a 100% secure product and I'd say there is room for improvement in the security area and functionality. I would also like to see more features inside Docker as well as more integration with different solutions.

The solution isn't always that stable.

I believe Docker is scalable.

I like their technical support but I mostly use their external documentation.

The initial setup was really easy and the deployment was fast and straightforward. I did everything myself.

We use the free version of Docker.

I don't use any other software, given that Docker is our solution.

My advice to others is to just do it. It is a no-brainer. I really recommend this solution and on a scale from one to ten, my rating is a nine.

We use the hybrid version of solution with public and on-premises. Our primary use case for Docker is to make it easier for us deploy and maintainon our applications. 

Well dockerized application are much easier to maintain, at a fewer cost.

Manage complex application architecture and installation procedure in simple text files.

Dynamic port association on active containers.

I think the solution is stable enough.

The solution follows scalability of the application it handles. A monolite application will not become scalable as soon as it is dockerized without architecture change. 

Good support, really active community.

Initial setup of docker itself is very simple.

We implement docker y ourself.

We use the free version of this solution.

We did look around for other options but nothing could compare to this solution.

My advice to others would be to start simple. On a scale of one to ten, I will rate Docker a nine. It is a compact, complete solution that performs well.

We use this solution for the virtualization of monolithic apps, providing a better scalable and agile solution.

This solution has improved our organization with the agility, microservices approach, and scalable solutions for distributed systems.

The most valuable features of this solution are scalability and agility. It is easy to manage and deploy.

The orchestration and tracing should be improved.

My experience with Docker is in helping to provide solutions for my clients. Specifically, this involves continuous integration and continuous deployment for my clients' workflow.

We are using Docker for a client that we currently have in India. They are building a solution for the medical industry. Docker is very helpful for taking the code from development and applying it to the end user.

The most important thing that my clients focus on is rapid deployment. In this regard, Docker wins hands-down.

It would be very nice to have a GUI that can be used by any administrator, and not just people who have experience with Docker.

The stability of this solution is perfect. Five stars.

This solution scales very well, and it can be scaled to the entire infrastructure when required.

Three of my clients are currently using Docker, and all of them are involved in software development. One of my clients is in the process of scaling up, moving from ten to one hundred and fifty developers within the next six months.

The documentation for this solution is excellent. So far, all of the problems that I have faced have been solved by looking at the documentation.

We did not use another solution prior to this one.

The setup was very straightforward. I just followed the documentation on the Docker website, and it went smoothly.

Implementation for the client was not very big. It was eight to ten developers, and it took between one and two days to complete. The most important thing on our end was to get our client's infrastructure up and running with Docker.

One person can handle the deployment and maintenance of this solution.

We implement this solution for our clients using our in-house team.

I am using the community edition, rather than the enterprise edition because I am operating on a very small scale at the moment. The community edition does not require a license and is completely free.

We did not evaluate options other than Docker.

My advice to anybody who is implementing this solution is to read the documentation very carefully. That can give a lot of relief when the client needs a solution.

If Docker had a graphical user interface then it would be a perfect solution.

I would rate this solution and eight out of ten.

I use Docker during both development time when I write new applications and for production where we deploy our applications on platforms such as Kubernetes and Mesos.

Now it is easier to set up the development environment and also to test the applications on the pipelines.

The most valuables features are its ease of use and ease in setting up environments.

The solution would benefit in improvements made to the storage, cleaning up information from the disk, and reading logs.