We performed a comparison between Quest InTrust and USM Anywhere based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, Datadog and others in Log Management."I would rate the technical support very well as they are knowledgeable and quick to respond."
"Our main focus was intrusion detection, alerts, and correlation. It's easy to use AlienVault and integrate it with other alert tools because it includes lots of connectors. Either the tool is already there, or AlienVault will write an API for us if they don't have a connector for the solution that is providing the logs."
"It brought our logs into one place for review and set up alarms based on changes we were missing due to lack of having one place for everything to go."
"It has powerful threat detection, incident response, and compliance management."
"The most valuable features of AT&T AlienVault USM are the ease of management and knowledge of what is on the network of my customers. It's easy to understand the problems, and management our alarms and events."
"Reports are customized, so you can present them to executives or engineers."
"What I find the most valuable about USM Anywhere is its compliance. It shows a list of all the administrators logged on and does it quite well. There are no whistles and bells, it's reliable and simple to use."
"The Event Correlation and vulnerability scans have been the most useful. As a 24/7 SOC, we use the incoming alarms to give an overview of suspicious traffic going through the network. It's easy to look at the correlated events and see the broad picture of traffic for that customer. Vulnerability scans are good for providing patch and remediation guidelines to keep customer systems secure."
"We had used previous products and found AlienVault centralized the logging for our security."
"It was very complex. There was poor native correlation. "
"It needs to have better reporting. "
"Search performance can be slow. The Raw Logs feature is painfully slow. And if we're talking about the newer, the Anywhere product, you can't even schedule reports on the thing. There are probably a dozen other features I'd really like to see there, but that would be one of the biggies."
"Pay attention to false-positive event automatic correlations."
"Windows log collection works with HIDS, but documentation is sparse and confusing."
"USM Anywhere relies a lot on the community putting the data in. Often, you'll right-click on the attack, but nothing will be found. That's a weakness of it."
"The solution is a bit complicated. It could be simplified quite a bit."
"Adding a parsing interface for the customers would make AT&T AlienVault USM better."
"It should be able to communicate with other security solutions to stop threats."
"One area that has room for improvement is storage. AllienVault is a good place to put logs, but sometimes it's a tough place to go get logs... The logger can only hold so much data. If they improved that, that would help."
Earn 20 points
Quest InTrust is ranked 57th in Log Management while USM Anywhere is ranked 15th in Log Management with 113 reviews. Quest InTrust is rated 8.0, while USM Anywhere is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Quest InTrust writes "Technical support is knowledgeable and quick to respond". On the other hand, the top reviewer of USM Anywhere writes "Easy to use and affordable". Quest InTrust is most compared with Change Auditor for Windows File Servers and syslog-ng, whereas USM Anywhere is most compared with Wazuh, AlienVault OSSIM, IBM Security QRadar, Splunk Enterprise Security and Microsoft Sentinel.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
