We performed a comparison between Prolexic and Radware DefenseFlow based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cloudflare, NETSCOUT, Akamai and others in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection."The solution does not have hardware or maintenance requirements and is very easy to scale."
"Recently, our company has been facing difficulties due to attacks originating from the Russian Federation. DefenseFlow has proven to be a highly effective solution in protecting our customers."
"The tool's machine learning and artificial intelligence help to prevent attacks by analyzing real-time traffic."
"The solution needs additional product options for small and medium enterprises."
"Radware DefenseFlow should add new features and algorithms to make it efficient."
"Its documentation is not 100% clear, making it the weakest aspect of Radware. We have encountered some difficulties in understanding how to configure it correctly."
Prolexic is ranked 14th in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection with 4 reviews while Radware DefenseFlow is ranked 23rd in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection with 2 reviews. Prolexic is rated 7.8, while Radware DefenseFlow is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Prolexic writes "Scaling is very easy but more options are needed for enterprise environments". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Radware DefenseFlow writes "A security solution to protect networks with extensive troubleshooting". Prolexic is most compared with Cloudflare DDoS, Akamai App and API Protector, Cloudflare, Arbor DDoS and AWS Shield, whereas Radware DefenseFlow is most compared with Radware DefensePro and Arbor DDoS.
See our list of best Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection vendors.
We monitor all Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.