OpenText Exstream vs THREADS comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
OpenText Logo
2,221 views|1,870 comparisons
THREADS Logo
26 views|10 comparisons
Ranking
Views
2,221
Comparisons
1,870
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
26
Comparisons
10
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
HP Exstream, Exstream, OpenText Communications Center Enterprise (CCE)
Learn More
THREADS
Video Not Available
Overview
OpenText Exstream allows business users to optimize customer engagement through the design and delivery of ultra-personalized, consistent, compliant, communications - delivered anytime, anywhere.

Threads empowers teams to easily share, discuss, and make decisions no matter where they are.

Sample Customers
Merrill Lynch, Northshore Credit, Humana, Aviva Insurance, Penn National, Unum, RDS Group, Denver Water, E.On, Powergrid International Whitepaper
BUFFER, BREX, The Atlantic, Whisper, Bitwise, Aspire
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm23%
Insurance Company20%
Computer Software Company14%
Manufacturing Company5%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise75%
No Data Available

OpenText Exstream is ranked 2nd in Customer Communications Management (CCM) while THREADS is ranked 23rd in Customer Communications Management (CCM). OpenText Exstream is rated 0.0, while THREADS is rated 0.0. On the other hand, OpenText Exstream is most compared with Quadient Inspire, Smart Communications, Pitney Bowes EngageOne, Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms and Oracle Documaker, whereas THREADS is most compared with .

See our list of best Customer Communications Management (CCM) vendors.

We monitor all Customer Communications Management (CCM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.