We performed a comparison between Mirantis Container Cloud and Singularity Cloud Security by SentinelOne based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Container Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a compact, complete solution that performs well."
"The initial setup was really easy and the deployment was fast and straightforward."
"Docker is very helpful for taking the code from development and applying it to the end user."
"The product's initial setup phase is simple."
"I think the volume binding is a really interesting feature."
"I use Docker in combination with Kubernetes. Management of software packages is easy. It also can be done fast. Rolling out new software updates is smoother and faster due to Mirantis Container Cloud."
"Mirantis Container Cloud operates similarly to how we interact with databases. It provides a comprehensive platform for deploying and managing containerized applications across cloud environments."
"The most valuable feature is its ease of use."
"We really appreciate the Slack integration. When we have an incident, we get an instant notification. We also use Joe Sandbox, which Singularity can integrate with, so we can verify if a threat is legitimate."
"It is fairly simple. Anybody can use it."
"PingSafe has a dashboard that can detect the criticality of a particular problem, whether it falls under critical, medium, or low vulnerability."
"We use the infrastructure as code scanning, which is good."
"It is advantageous in terms of time-saving and cost reduction."
"Atlas security graph is pretty cool. It maps out relationships between components on AWS, like load balancers and servers. This helps visualize potential attack paths and even suggests attack paths a malicious actor might take."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to gain deep visibility into the workloads inside containers."
"The multi-cloud support is valuable. They are expanding to different clouds. It is not restricted to only AWS. It allows us to have different clouds on one platform."
"Mirantis Container Cloud needs to improve its documentation."
"The initial setup was quite complex."
"With the Mirantis runtime being removed from Kubernetes, which is the industry-wide standard for orchestration of containers, I think it's going in a direction that is not super scalable."
"In my previous years, I have brainstormed about the development of Container software. I have recently shifted focus, but the knowledge gained from those were really helpful. In my experience, Containers have their own complexities and to implement them, open source information is crucial. A software with new features would be beneficial. I suggest to implement a flow-based approach for container sequences, similar to Google Cloud's machine learning. The current process of deploying containers involves too many steps, and a more streamlined method would be appreciated. I've even automated deployment using APIs. Overall, simplifying container management and deployment processes would be valuable."
"It will be better if the product provides dynamic load-balancing capabilities."
"It would be very nice to have a GUI that can be used by any administrator, and not just people who have experience with Docker."
"I would also like to see more features inside Docker as well as more integration with different solutions."
"This solution is open-source and they need to focus on improving the Linux Operating Systems' GUI. It does not have a GUI making it not user-friendly. Additionally, the containers need to improve security and compliance."
"Maybe container runtime security could be improved."
"I would like PingSafe to add real-time detection of vulnerabilities and cloud misconfigurations."
"When we get a new finding from PingSafe, I wish we could get an alert in the console, so we can work on it before we see it in the report. It would be very useful for the team that is actively working on the PingSafe platform, so we can close the issue the same day before it appears in the daily report."
"For vulnerabilities, they are showing CVE ID. The naming convention should be better so that it indicates the container where a vulnerability is present. Currently, they are only showing CVE ID, but the same CVE ID might be present in multiple containers. We would like to have the container name so that we can easily fix the issue."
"Their search feature could be better."
"PingSafe can improve by eliminating 100 percent of the false positives."
"In some cases, the rules are strictly enforced but do not align with real-world use cases."
"They could generally give us better comprehensive rules."
More Singularity Cloud Security by SentinelOne Pricing and Cost Advice →
Mirantis Container Cloud is ranked 14th in Container Security with 29 reviews while Singularity Cloud Security by SentinelOne is ranked 6th in Container Security with 67 reviews. Mirantis Container Cloud is rated 8.8, while Singularity Cloud Security by SentinelOne is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Mirantis Container Cloud writes "An easy-to-manage solution that helps to manage web pages ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Singularity Cloud Security by SentinelOne writes "Provides excellent workload telemetry, hunting capabilities, and deep visibility ". Mirantis Container Cloud is most compared with SUSE Rancher, whereas Singularity Cloud Security by SentinelOne is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, Orca Security, AWS GuardDuty and Qualys VMDR. See our Mirantis Container Cloud vs. Singularity Cloud Security by SentinelOne report.
See our list of best Container Security vendors.
We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
