We performed a comparison between Microsoft ATA [EOL] and Splunk User Behavior Analytics based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Splunk, Rapid7 and others in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)."One of the most valuable features is the ability to report on questionable activity."
"The solution works well when used with other Microsoft solutions."
"The stability of the solution is very good."
"The solution is extremely scalable. Our customers are regularly scaling up after installing Splunk."
"This is a good security product."
"It's easily scalable."
"Because of some of the visualizations that we utilize, we are able to understand strange, unusual traffic on our networks."
"The most valuable feature is being able to take data and put it into other systems so that we could see the output, and to see where we need to apply our focus."
"The solution appears to be stable, although we haven't used it heavily."
"The solution is definitely scalable."
"It is a solution that helps test and measure customer satisfaction."
"It would be ideal if the interface allowed for more granular configurations. For example, if I were to set a rule that is a deviation from the pre-defined rules in the Microsoft product, there's conflict."
"There are occasions where it generates some false positives and you have to embark into figuring it out. You need to find out if it was a true alert or a false positive. It's a little bit cumbersome in that area."
"Some of the newer features are not completely there yet... For example, there's a tool that allows you to grade your overall internal security and I don't feel that it's completely accurate."
"I'm not aware of any lacking features."
"We'd like the ability to do custom searches."
"There are occasional bugs."
"The price of Splunk UBA is too high."
"We want to have an automated system for bot hunting that enables us to detect anomalies predictively based on historical data. It would be helpful if Splunk included process mining as an alternative option. We have a threat workflow, but it would be useful if we could supplement that with some process mining capabilities over time."
"Currently, a lot of network operations need improvement. We still need people to handle incidents. Our vision is to leverage status and convert it directly from the network devices. It would be ideal if we could take action using APIs and API code and remove manual processes."
"It could be easier to scale the solution if you are using it on-premise, not in the cloud."
"The ability to do more complicated data investigation would be a welcome addition for pros, though the functionality now gives most people what they need."
More Splunk User Behavior Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Microsoft ATA [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) while Splunk User Behavior Analytics is ranked 2nd in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) with 17 reviews. Microsoft ATA [EOL] is rated 6.6, while Splunk User Behavior Analytics is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Microsoft ATA [EOL] writes "Easy to define rules but interface needs better granularity and only integrates well with other Microsoft solutions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk User Behavior Analytics writes "Easy to configure and easy to use solution that integrates with many applications and scripts ". Microsoft ATA [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Splunk User Behavior Analytics is most compared with Darktrace, Microsoft Defender for Identity, IBM Security QRadar, Cynet and Varonis Datalert.
See our list of best User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) vendors.
We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.