Maintenance Connection vs QAD Enterprise Asset Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
Views
12
Comparisons
9
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
130
Comparisons
120
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
QAD MLS
Learn More
Maintenance Connection
Video Not Available
Overview

Maintenance Connection delivers CMMS software implementations that are certified for success. See how 350,000 maintenance professionals improve facility operations with MC.

QAD Enterprise Asset Management is an integrated plant operation solution that enables companies to operate plants more efficiently by keeping equipment running at the lowest cost. Enterprise Asset Management manages capital projects to bring assets online and then manages those assets through operational life and replacement. It manages plant maintenance; provides visibility into spare parts inventory across multiple facilities; and tracks capital, customer-funded, and expense projects.

Sample Customers
Blue Apron, Bridgestone, Cree, Fastenal Company, Five Hour Energy, Mercedes Benz, Nissan, Procter and Gamble, SSAB, Aramark, AT&T, Crest Foods, DirecTV, Gap, LifeSouth Community Blood Centers, Laureate Group, Maine Medical Center, Novartis, Nusil
SOLAFT

Maintenance Connection is ranked 4th in Computerized Maintenance Management Software (CMMS) while QAD Enterprise Asset Management is ranked 8th in Enterprise Asset Management. Maintenance Connection is rated 0.0, while QAD Enterprise Asset Management is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Maintenance Connection is most compared with IBM Maximo, whereas QAD Enterprise Asset Management is most compared with .

See our list of best Enterprise Asset Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.