LANDesk Systems Lifecycle Management [EOL] vs Symantec Server Management Suite comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between LANDesk Systems Lifecycle Management [EOL] and Symantec Server Management Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Microsoft, ServiceNow and others in Server Monitoring.
To learn more, read our detailed Server Monitoring Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,065 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Unranked
In Server Monitoring
31st
out of 42 in Server Monitoring
Views
78
Comparisons
67
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Server Monitoring
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Microsoft, ServiceNow and others in Server Monitoring. Updated: April 2024.
769,065 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Systems Lifecycle Management
Symantec Altirs Server Management Suite
Learn More
Overview

Modernize your IT, satisfy growing user expectations, and manage all the devices users carry from a single, unified endpoint management solution. Update how you deliver applications to users through automated rollout projects and a self-service app store experience. LANDESK Management Suite is proven, reliable client management software that integrates with multiple IT solutions. You gain greater visibility into what devices you have and boost IT and user productivity.

Symantec Server Management Suite provides IT administrators with a comprehensive solution for managing physical and virtual servers across a broad array of platforms. The suite provides solutions to provision, control, automate, and monitor servers from a central console. With these tools, organizations gain and maintain control of their servers, reduce service interruptions, and increase uptime. With Server Management Suite, organizations are able to:

  • Manage change with confidence by driving predictable and repeatable day-to-day operations.
  • Make smarter, faster decisions with real-time conclusions that are data-driven.
  • Drive innovation through the adoption of new technologies and implementation of automated processes without adding new tools, people, or methodologies.
Sample Customers
MBDA, Admiral Group, 21st Century Oncology, The Bunker, The MAC Services Group, Christopher Newport University, Derbyshire Health Informatics Services, Cegedim Outsourcing, RuffaloCODY, Apollo-Optik
Amway (China) Co. Ltd., Barnabas Health, Cabela's Inc., College of Science, Technology, and Applied Arts of Trinidad and Tobago (COSTAATT), Comparex, DHL Hub Leipzig GmbH, GaVI GmbH, Helvetia Versicherungen, Kwizda Holdings GmbH, NASDAQ OMX Group Inc., Ningbo Municipal Yinzhou District No.2 Hospital, Shanghai Pudong International Container Terminals Co. Ltd., Travelport, University of Oxford
Buyer's Guide
Server Monitoring
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Microsoft, ServiceNow and others in Server Monitoring. Updated: April 2024.
769,065 professionals have used our research since 2012.

LANDesk Systems Lifecycle Management [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Server Monitoring while Symantec Server Management Suite is ranked 31st in Server Monitoring. LANDesk Systems Lifecycle Management [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Symantec Server Management Suite is rated 0.0. On the other hand, LANDesk Systems Lifecycle Management [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Symantec Server Management Suite is most compared with MidVision RapidDeploy.

See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.