We performed a comparison between Ilex Sign&go and Microsoft Sentillion eXpresso based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Auth0 and others in Single Sign-On (SSO)."The on-premises deployment meets restrictions and the end-user is able to control all the configuration in their own IT environment."
"The most valuable features of the solution are its ease of use and its robustness."
"Security is the best feature of Microsoft Azure Sentinel. It has its own base security. Our customers like that the security is available in Azure."
"There is no software as a service or PaaS (Platform as a Service) offering from Ilex. The only option is on-premises integration."
"The shortcomings in the stability need improvement."
"We had some feedback from customers who have said it was a confusing product. The product is confusing to use for the end-user. For example, they do not know how to migrate the Azure Sentinel, but others have liked the product that has started working on it."
More Microsoft Sentillion eXpresso Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Ilex Sign&go is ranked 24th in Single Sign-On (SSO) while Microsoft Sentillion eXpresso is ranked 18th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 3 reviews. Ilex Sign&go is rated 8.0, while Microsoft Sentillion eXpresso is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Ilex Sign&go writes "Strong single sign on security comes packaged with simplicity in this on-premises-only solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Sentillion eXpresso writes "Offers robustness and ease of use". Ilex Sign&go is most compared with Okta Workforce Identity and Microsoft Entra ID, whereas Microsoft Sentillion eXpresso is most compared with .
See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.