We performed a comparison between IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager and Nastel AutoPilot based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.More IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager is ranked 55th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 2 reviews while Nastel AutoPilot is ranked 82nd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager is rated 6.6, while Nastel AutoPilot is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager writes "Integrates well with IBM technologies, but it's outdated and lacks essential features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nastel AutoPilot writes "You can easily scale it for high message rates, but it's primarily a flow-monitoring tool rather than an APM". IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager is most compared with Dynatrace, IBM Application Performance Management and Azure Monitor, whereas Nastel AutoPilot is most compared with . See our IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager vs. Nastel AutoPilot report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.