Hypersocket SSO [EOL] vs IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Hypersocket SSO [EOL] and IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Auth0 and others in Single Sign-On (SSO).
To learn more, read our detailed Single Sign-On (SSO) Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,065 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The IBM prices are, as ever, extortionate, even with a business partnership, and high levels of discounts."
  • More IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Single Sign-On (SSO)
    Unranked
    In Single Sign-On (SSO)
    Buyer's Guide
    Single Sign-On (SSO)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Auth0 and others in Single Sign-On (SSO). Updated: April 2024.
    769,065 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Tivoli Access Manager, IBM Security Access Manager
    Learn More
    Hypersocket Software
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Hypersocket SSO is a single sign-on server that automatically populates user passwords and logs users into webapps. Increasing user productivity and security with transparant, role-based access delivered ready-to-run on a virutal appliance on-premise or in-cloud.

    IBM Tivoli Access Manager is a robust and secure centralized policy management solution for e-business and distributed applications. IBM Tivoli Access Manager WebSEAL is a high performance, multi-threaded Web server that applies fine-grained security policy to the Tivoli Access Manager protected Web object space. WebSEAL can provide single sign-on solutions and incorporate back-end Web application server resources into its security policy.
    Sample Customers
    Rexam, Citb, BCM, Ryder, Huawei, Ohio State University, Jacobs, Cisco, Xerox, Honeywell, Cofely Quentris, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS, Special Olympics
    Essex Technology Group Inc.
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Government25%
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Insurance Company25%
    Energy/Utilities Company13%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise62%
    Buyer's Guide
    Single Sign-On (SSO)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Auth0 and others in Single Sign-On (SSO). Updated: April 2024.
    769,065 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Hypersocket SSO [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Single Sign-On (SSO) while IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Single Sign-On (SSO). Hypersocket SSO [EOL] is rated 0.0, while IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] writes "Reverse proxy means applications need only minimal changes to support SSO with ISAM". Hypersocket SSO [EOL] is most compared with , whereas IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.

    We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.